Friday, April 29, 2016

Single-Payer Health Care on Colorado Ballot in 2016


On a brisk morning in Denver recently, an ambulance pulled up in front of a downtown office tower. "I think the patient is going to make it," Dr. Irene Aguilar said as a team rolled out the gurney. This wasn't a medical emergency, but rather a bit of political theater. The gurney held several big boxes of signed petitions to be delivered to the Colorado Secretary of State's office. The group ColoradoCareYES gathered enough signatures, more than 100,000, to put a single-payer health system on the ballot next fall.

Under the plan, Coloradans would still pick their own providers, but the new system would pick up all the bills. There would be no deductibles, and fewer and smaller copays.

Aguilar, the doctor who accompanied the box-filled gurney, is also a Colorado State Senator and a Democrat. She led the rally at Denver's Civic Center the day the signatures were delivered. "This is not going to be an easy fight," Aguilar says. Obamacare has been a good start, she says. It has sliced Colorado's uninsured rate in half. But many people are still uninsured, and others struggle to pay their premiums and out-of-pocket costs.

The idea behind ColoradoCare, Aguilar says, is "to have everybody paying in but everybody having access to health care that will keep them healthy, keep them working, keep them contributing to our society."

Here are some key features of the proposal: Seniors would stay in the Medicare system, and those in Tricare, the military health system, could keep that insurance. And anybody would be free to buy private coverage from a private insurer, though they would still have to pay for ColoradoCare. It would work like a single-payer plan, in the sense that everybody pays in, and everybody would be automatically covered, one way or another.

To finance the project, Colorado employers would pay nearly 7 percent in a payroll tax. Employees would pay 3 percent or more of their gross pay toward the health plan. The self-employed would need to pony up 10 percent of their annual net income to cover the employee's contribution plus the employer's contribution, analogous to the formula used to calculate federal self-employment tax. All in all, supporters say, these proposed tax hikes would raise around $25 billion, and save residents money in the long run.

But the tax hike could be a concern for many voters according to Michele Lueck, President and CEO of the Colorado Health Institute, a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank. "The price tag is just enormous, right?" she says. At $25 billion, "it rivals the state budget."

The proposed system would also put 4,000 brokers out of work and lead to longer waits for care, according to Tammy Niederman, representative of a trade group for health insurance brokers. "This will inevitably ration care," Niederman says. "There's no way to put in a universal system that doesn't do that."

Colorado's insurers and its hospital association haven't yet taken a position on the measure. Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper is also reserving judgment. "A lot of people say it'll cost a lot more," Hickenlooper says. "A lot of people say it's going to be the salvation and lower the costs. Let's find out what the numbers say."

Meanwhile, all agree that the total numbers in political advertising dollars spent for and against the measure are sure to be big.

The single-payer advocacy group ColoradoCareYes raised nearly $330,000 in contributions in 2015, according to filings made with the Colorado Secretary of State's office. That put the organization's donations in the top 10 among groups advocating for Colorado issues this year.

It's not clear how much money Advancing Colorado, a group opposing the single-payer ballot measure, has raised so far. But it has launched a digital campaign already that says, "ColoradoCare is a killer." And other forces opposed to the single-payer ballot initiative have started to mobilize. A group called "Committee to Stop Colorado Care," based in Parker, Colo., registered with the State in November.











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
Digg! StumbleUpon

No comments: