The Fight over Mail-in-Voting is Heating Up with Election Day just over Two Months away. Twenty-Five States have Challenged a Trump (R) Administration Rule that would give the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Additional Procedures for Handling Election Related Mail, including Ballot Tracking, Unique Barcodes, and Verification of Voters Approved, to Receive Mail-in-allots.
A Federal Judge issued a Temporary Restraining Order Blocking the USPS Rule, while Supporters Argue the Changes would Improve Election Integrity and Allow Voters and Election Officials to Track Ballots through the Mail. Greg Bishop is joined by Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at Advancing American Freedom, to break down the Latest Court Battle, what the USPS Ruels would Actually do and whether there is enough time to Implement them before the 2026 Election. The Segment also Examines the Debate over Mail-in-Voting, Absentee Ballots, and the SAVE America Act's Proposed Proof-of-Citizenship Requirements.
Coalition of 25 States, including California, Colorado, New York,and Washington, has Filed a Lawsuit against the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) a New Rule that would give the Agency Authority to Regulate Mail‑in-Voting ahead of the November 2026 midterm elections. A Coalition of 25 States, including: Colorado, Washington, New York, has Filed a Lawsuit against the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) over a New Rule that would give the Agency Authority to Regulate Mail‑in-Voting ahead of the November 2026 Mmidterm Elections
Officials from 23 Democratic States and the District of Columbia, filed a Lawsuit 8/1/2026 seeking to Block Trump's latest Executive Order (EO) that aims to Restrict Mail Voting, Arguing the Directive Unconstitutionally attempts to Interfere with States'Administration of Elections. The Lawsuit, led by California, was Filed with the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts. It Asserts that neither the Constitution nor any Federal Law givesTrump the Power to Mandate Widespread Cchanges to States' Electoral Systems or Vvoting Procedures.
The Measure, they said, "transgress Plaintiff States' constitutional power to prescribe the time, place, and manner of federal elections" and seeks to "amend and dictate election law by fiat based on the President's whims."
The Executive Order at the Center of the Challenge was Signed by Trump on 8/1/2026, Months before the November Midterm Elections, and Lays Out New Requirements related to Mail Voting. The Directive Calls for the Department of Homeland (DHS) to Compile "State Citizenship Lists" of U.S. Citizens who are Eeligible to Vote in Federal Elections and Requires the USPS to send Mail or Absentee Ballots only to Voters on each State's List.
Trump's Measure also Lays out Specific Requirements for Mail Ballot Envelopes, including Requiring them to Bear a Uunique Barcode for Tracking. States and Localities that don't Comply with the Executive Order are at Risk of Losing Federal Funding. The Directive has already been Challenged by a Coalition of Major Democratic Groups, which Accused Trump of Attempting to Rewrite Election Rules for Partisan Ggain. In the Lawsuit, the States Warned that the Trump Order "violates bedrock principles of federalism and separation of powers."
"Each Plaintiff State has duly Enacted Laws Governing Voter Rrolls and Mail Voting that are, where Applicable, Consistent with Statutory Requirements set Forth by Congress," they wrote. "The EO disregards States' inherent sovereignty and attempts to arrogate to the President the States' and Congress's constitutional power to regulate federal elections."
Trump has long Railed against Mail Voting, Claiming that the Method is "Cheating" and Compromises Election Integrity. But instances of Mail-Voting Fraud are Rare, and there is No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud. Trump himself has taken Advantage of Voting-by-Mail, Casting a Mail Ballot in a Special Election Last Month for a Florida State House Seat.
The Constitution's Elections Clause gives States the Power to Set the "times, places and manner" of Federal Elections, and Congress also has the Authority to Pass Election Regulations. While Trump often Accuses Democratic States of Allowing Noncitizens to Cast Ballots in Federal Elections, it is a Federal Crime to do so. Instances of Noncitizen Vvoting are Rare.
Trump s EO comes as He has Pressured the Senate to Pass the SAVE America Act, which would Require Americans to show Proof-of-Citizenship in Person to Rregister to Vote in Federal Elections and Iimplement Photo ID Requirements for Voting. The House Approved the Measure in 2/2026, but it's Unlikely to Clear the GOP-led Senate, where most Legislation Requires 60 Votes to Advance.
Trump Signed another EO in 2025, which sought to Overhaul U.S. Elections and Require Documentary Proof of Citizenship to Register to Vote, but has been Bblocked in Court.

NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


