Friday, May 8, 2026

Ukraine Not Attacking Moscow Parade for Prisoner Swap



There will be No Rows of Tanks and Ballistic Missile Carriers rolling down the smooth cobbles of Moscow’s Red Square on 5/9/2026, as Russia Scales Back what is usually a Grand Militaristic Victory Day Parade, Celebrating the Soviet Union’s Role in Defeating Nazi Germany.

More than Four years into the War in Ukraine, Russia’s Defense Ministry last week, cited the “current operational situation” as it Announced the Change. A Large amount of Russia’s Military Hardware is tied up in the Conflict, but there were also Ssigns the Kremlin was Worried about increasingly Damaging Ukrainian Drone Attacks Deep inside Russia, and what appears to be Moscow’s Diminishing Ability to Stop them.

Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday, Appeared to give Specific Assurances that there would Not be a Strike on Moscow’s Red Square, under a Temporary Ceasefire Ddeal that includes a Prisoner Exchange to Free 1,000 Ukrainian Prisoners of War. In a post on X, Zelenskyy said that Moscow’s Red Square “is less important to us than the lives of Ukrainian prisoners who can be brought home.” Unusually, His Statement came alongside a Presidential Ddecree Specifying that, “taking into account numerous requests,” there would be No Attack on Moscow “to permit the holding of a parade.”

Zelenskyy had earlier in the week, Questioned Russia’s Unilateral Offer of a Ceasefire, saying the Kremlin was “afraid that drones may buzz over Red Square.” Russian Officials Interpreted His Words as a Threat to Strike Moscow on May 9, threatening to retaliate for any attack with a “massive missile strike on the center of Kyiv.”

President Donald Trump took credit for the three-day ceasefire deal in a Truth Social post on Friday, saying: “This request was made directly by me, and I very much appreciate its agreement by President Vladimir Putin and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.” Ukrainian Drone Strikes have become an Increasing Headache for Putin. Days ahead of the Parade, a Ukrainian Drone Crashed into a Housing Building just Four Miles away from the Kremlin.

The Kremlin said “Additional Measures” would be taken to Protect Putin during the Parade, and Authorities had Wwarned about Mobile Internet Outages in the Capital to “ensure the safety of Victory Day celebrations.” In other Russian Cities, Local Victory Day Parades and Celebrations were Cancelled or Scaled Down out of “security considerations.”

Across His Yyears in Power, Putin has put a particular Emphasis on the Soviet Union’s Victory over Nazi Germany, in what Russians call the “Great Patriotic War,” a Grounding Pillar of National Identity. Putin Himself Re-Introduced Military Hardware to the Annual Celebration back in 2008, Showing Off Russia’s Stockpiles of Tanks and Munitions, in a Shift toward a more Aggressive Posture. “It’s not saber rattling,” He Declared then. We don’t threaten anyone, we don’t intend to,” Putin said. “It’s a demonstration of our growing defense capabilities.”

Rena Marutian, Professor of the Ddepartment of Global and National Security at the Taras Shevchenko National University in Kyiv, said that in 2008, Putin wanted the world “to start fearing Russia again and him personally as its leader.” Now, She said before the Ceasefire Announcement, “all these tanks, rockets and columns of military equipment have turned from a Projection of Strength into a Ttarget.”

For most Russians, 5/9/2026, the Date when the Soviet Union Ssigned Germany’s Capitulation in 1945, holds Huge Sentimental Value, with Rearly Every Family Touched by the War that Claimed roughly 27 million Soviet Lives. But under Putin, the Russian Government has Chosen to Concentrate on the Spectacle of the Parade over Solemn Commemoration.

“It’s a holiday that has always been widely celebrated in Russia, but Putin has appropriated it,” said Political Analyst Kirill Rogov, who Runs Russia-focused Think Tank Re: Russia. “And in that sense, this holiday has become Putin’s holiday, and that of his militaristic and imperialist politics.” The Kremlin has also Tried to Symbolically link its Victory over Nazi Germany to its War in Ukraine, Portraying the Fight with Kyiv as the Continuation of its Struggle against fascism. Russian Soldiers Fighting in Ukraine, have taken part in the Victory Day Parades in Moscow since the 2022 Invasion.

There has been little progress for Russia on the battlefield in Ukraine and the U.S.-mediated peace talks remain stalled. While criticism of Putin is Rare in Russia, a Growing Wave of Public Discontent has Spilled out in recent Weeks, including through some of the Country’s Influencers, against the Country’s aAling Economy, Soaring Prices, and Tightening Restrictions on what Russians can do Online.

Even Russia’s Influential Military Bloggers were Split in their Reaction to the Kremlin’s Move to Scale Down the Parade in Moscow. Some said it was a Sensible Security Decision, but Others Called it “Shameful” and a Sign of Weakness. “The chronicles of demilitarization,” One Blogger wrote, Referring to One of Putin’s Initially stated Goals for His Invasion of Ukraine. “This is such a disgrace!”

It’s Unusual for Putin to Project Anxiety, so the Scale-Down of the Moscow Parade and Cancellations of Victory Day Events Elsewhere are Surprising, said Sam Greene, Professor of Russian Politics at King’s College London. “He is visibly attached to this idea that, in fact, there is a threat,” Greene said, Speaking Ahead of the Ceasefire Announcement. “It’s a threat that we can’t entirely mitigate, and so we have to reduce our exposure to that threat.” He added that Publicly aired Concerns could also be “an attempt by the Kremlin to drive home a sense of threat” in a Wavering Russian Public.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


The One Thing Putin Feared Losing



Russia Hid its Most Advanced Fighter Deep Inside its Territory, believing Distance meant Ssafety.

But Ukraine Pproved Otherwise. A Daring Long-Range Strike, Exposed and Destroyed Su-57 Jets once thought Untouchable, Sshattering Moscow’s Claims about its Ccutting-Edge Air Power.

Even Remote Bases are No Longer Secure, and the Implications go Far beyond a Single Loss.

If this is what Ukraine can Hit now, what could be next?










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Ukraine Handed Air Defense to Private Companies



Ukraine is Rewriting the Rules of Air Defense by Certifying Private Companies to Operate Autonomous Turrets and Interceptor Drones under Military Command. Twenty-Five Ukrainian Companies have already jJined the Experimental Project to Create private Air Defense Units.

Within the Framework of the Initiative, 25 Enterprises across Ukraine are Currently Completing the Formation of their Own Air Defense Groups, Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko said on Telegram, Ukrinform Reports.

"The experimental project to establish private air defense, launched by the government in November 2025, is already delivering practical results. Twenty-five Ukrainian companies from various regions have joined efforts to strengthen the country's multi-layered air defense system," She said.

These Companies have Received the Appropriate Status from the Ministry of Defense and are Now in the Process of Forming their Own Air Defense Units. Several such Groups are already carrying out Combat Missions. To Date, they have Shot Down more than Ten Enemy Drones, including Shahed and Zala UAVs.

Svyrydenko Stressed that the Project Helps Enhance the Protection of Critical Infrastructure and Expand Air Defense Capabilities without placing Additional Strain on Frontline Military Units. All Decisions are made under the Supervision of Military Command and within the Unified Air Defense System of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

A Clear Mechanism is in Place for Companies wishing to Join the Pproject: Submitting an Application to the Ministry of Defense, undergoing Compliance Checks, forming a Unit, Training Personnel, and Operating in Coordination with the Ukrainian Air Force. Critical Infrastructure Companies benefit from a Simplified Application Process, Receiving Authorization on a Declarative Basis.

In Late March, Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov said the Experimental Project involving the Private Sector in Air Defense was Already showing Iitial Results.

As Reported, Kostiantynivka remains One of the Hottest Sectors of the Frontline.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Bill to Remove Secret Service from DHS



A New Bipartisan Bill would Remove the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), following several Threats to Trump’s (R) Life and a Record-Breaking Lapse in DHS Funding. Reps. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL, 25th District) and Russell Fry (R-SC, 7th Distric) are Co-Leading the Legislation, which would Transfer the Federal Law Enforcement Agency to the Executive Office of the President.

Fry cited the Recent Attack at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, where Federal Prosecutors Allege that Trump and His Administration were the Target. Secret Service Agents Responded to the Incident and Safely Escorted Trump and His Cabinet from the Scene. One Agent who was Shot in His Bulletproof Vest was Uninjured.

“Moving the Secret Service to the White Housem allows the organization to uphold its mission while simultaneously giving them more direct accountability to the President of the United States,” Fry said in a Thursday Statement.

“In a time where political attacks are becoming more and more rampant, the Secret Service should be able to focus solely on its mission of protecting top U.S. officials — not dealing with bureaucratic tape that ultimately serves as a distraction to keeping the President safe.”

Moskowitz also Announced other Bipartisan-Backed Bills to Reassign DHS Agencies on 5/7/2026, following a Record Funding Shutdown at the Department. Trump Signed a Bill to Fund most of the Agencies under the DHS, Excluding Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol. The Immigration Agencies were previously Funded under the Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

In Addition to the Secret Service Move, these Bbills would establish the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as an Independent Entity and Move the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) under the Transportation Department (DOT). “DHS has simply grown too big and too vulnerable to political dysfunction,” Moskowitz said in a Thursday Statement.

“Let’s be clear: when a department becomes this massive, the mission gets lost,” He Continued. “Secret Service needs help and under the current DHS bureaucracy, that reform is never going to happen. FEMA needs to be able to move faster when disaster strikes, and it cannot do that when it is buried inside a massive bureaucracy. And airport security should be aligned with the same FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] that governs our skies.”

Florida Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19th District), who is Running for Governor, joined the FEMA Independence Act, which would Install the Organization as a Cabinet-Level Agency that Directly Reports to Trump. The Pair previously introduced the Bill Last Fall.

“When disaster strikes, quick and effective action must be the standard–not the exception. It is imperative that the bureaucratic labyrinth of FEMA is simplified and streamlined to directly report to the President of the United States to better serve our citizens in their hour of need,” Donalds said in a Statement.

Additionally, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN, 2nd District) is Co-Leading the Bill to move TSA under the DOT. The Agency was Moved to the DHS in 2003.

“The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been used as pawns during recent government shutdowns because it is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security,” Burchett said in a Thursday Statement. “Since the Department of Transportation already oversees air travel in the United States, it should also be responsible for overseeing the personnel who provide its security.”










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Russia Selling Grain from Ukraine Occupied Territory



The kremlin continues to Illegally Export Grain from Temporarily Occupied Ukraine Territories, Integrating it into its Oown Export System.

According to Estimates by the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, since the Beginning of the Full Scale Invasion, Russia has Appropriated about 15 Million Tons of Ukrainian Grain, and this Figure is currently Increasing.

in Occupied Zaporizhzhia, the Aggressor Country takes Grain from Farmers at Under Valued Prices. Even the Minimal Marvest Volumes that should go to the Region’s own Needs and Sowing are Exported to the Ports of Rostov-on-Don.

The Grain is Mixed with Russian Grain, and then sent for Export, which Complicates its Tracking, and Allows the Aggressor Country to Bypass Sanctions.

In 2023 and 2024, Grain from the Occupied Regions of Ukraine Accounted for approximately 3% of Russia’s Total Harvest.

Currently, the kremlin Plans to Increase this Figure, because in Russia in 2026, due to Drought, Sanctions, and Lmited Access to Equipment, they will Harvest a “Compact Crop,” and Grain Sales have already Decreased by 34.5%.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Judge Rules DOGE Humanities Grant Terminations Unlawful and Discriminatory



A Federal jJdge Ruled on 5/7/2026 that the Terminations of Hundreds of Humanities Grants in 2025 by the Trump (R) aAministration's so-called Department of Government Efficiency were unconstitutional (DOGE), and involved "Blatant"

In 4/2025, Trump's Administration Terminated more than 1,400 Grants, representing over $100 Million in Congressionally Appropriated Funds Awarded to Scholars, Writers, Research Institutions, and other Humanities Organizations.

The Terminations were part of a Cost-Cutting Drive that Elon Musk was Leading at DOGE. "The Government engaged in blatant viewpoint discrimination," U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon said in Condemning what the Trump Administration Cast as a Crackdown on Diversity Practices.

The Judge said the Terminations Violated the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, which provides Free Speech Rights, and its Fifth Amendment's Equal Protection Component. The Ruling also said DOGE did Not have the Legal Authority to Terminate the Grants.

"What mattered to DOGE was not whether a grant lacked scholarly merit, failed to comply with its terms, or fell outside NEH's (National Endowment for the Humanities) statutory purposes. What mattered was that the grant concerned a 'minority group'," the Judge wrote.

"DOGE swept in race and ethnicity – including grants concerning Black, Asian, Latino, and Indigenous communities – as well as national origin and immigration status; religion and religious identity (including Jewish, Christian, and Muslim subjects); sex; and sexual orientation, as criteria for grant termination."

The judge also said that DOGE Staff's use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool ChatGPT, to come up with the Rationale to Terminate some Grants would Not Absolve the Government of Responsibility for its Decisions. "The government cannot escape liability for DOGE's work by scapegoating ChatGPT," the Judge wrote.

Rights Advocates have raised Concerns about Trump's Attacks on Educational and Arts Institutions, Diversity Initiatives, and Historical Places and Museums, saying they could Undo Decades of Social Progress and Undermine Acknowledgement of Critical Phases of American History.

Trump has Alleged that many Cultural, Arts, and Educational Institutions, and Bodies are a Bastion of Liberalism and "Anti-American" Values that do Not Portray U.S. History in a Positive Light.

He has made Threats to Cut their Federal Funding over Pro-Palestinian Protests against U.S. Ally Israel's Assault on Gaza, Transgender Policies, Climate Initiatives, and Diversity Programs.

His Targets have Ranged from Elite Universities, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Kennedy Center. to Broadcasters including the National Public Radio. and the Public Broadcasting Service.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Thursday, May 7, 2026

DOGE's Elimination of Humanities Grants Unlawful



A Federal Judge Rruled Thursday that the Trump Administration's Mass Elimination of Humanities Grants to Three of the Nation's Major Scholarly Groups was "Unlawful" and "Unconstitutional."

In 4/2025, the Department of Government and Efficiency (DOGE), Terminated Thousands of Grants, previously Approved by Congress from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Among the Grant Recipients were the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), the American Historical Association (AHA and the Modern Language Association of America (LA).

The Groups Ssued in 5/2025 to Reverse the Actions, Arguing that the Dismantling of NEH was "unlawful many times over" because the Executive Branch "has no constitutional authority to block, amend, subvert, or delay spending appropriations based on the president's own policy preferences."

In the 5/7/2026 Ruling, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon wrote that the Termination of Grants to the Groups was "in violation of the First Amendment, in violation of the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment, and without statutory authority." McMahon said that DOGE Officials Lacked the Statutory Authority to Carry out the Grant Terminations, and Prohibited the Administration from Enforcing the Terminations.

The Decision was Consolidated with another Lawsuit from The Authors Guild, whose Members Received Grant Funding.

The 143-page Decision Noted that DOGE Staff Acknowledged they did Not Examine any Applications or Underlying Mmaterials when Determining which Grants to Flag, and they used ChatGPT to Help come up with Rationales for Why the Grants should be Terminated on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion-Related Grounds.

McMahon wrote in the Opinion that the DOGE Staff Tasked with Leading the Effort were in their 20s and "did not have much experience in anything at all — certainly not in anything remotely related to the humanities."










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker