New Defense Project in Maryland

Trump (R) on 10/6/2026 Plans to Highlight a $3.7 Billion Investment by the Military Technology Company Anduril, to Build Components for Nuclear-Powered Submarines at a Baltimore-area Shipyard. It's One of a Series of Events Trump is holding across the Country, to Showcase Investments in Factories, as High Gasoline Prices from the Iran War and Persistently elevated Inflation have Damaged Trump’s Approval Ratings on the Economy. Trump is trying to Rally Republican Voters with less than a Month before the Midterm Elections on 11/3/2026.

This Event, though, is in the Ssolidly Blue State of Maryland, and Gov. Wes Moore (D) won't be there. The Feud Threatened to Overshadow the Announcement. Ammar Moussa, a Spokesman for the Governor, said Moore was Blocked from Speaking at the Event. A White House Official, said Moore had been Invited to Attend the Event, as a Guest. Moore, who is Seeking Re-Election, is considered a Potential Presidential Ccandidate in 2028.

Moore in a Statement said the Project could Potentially Create “the most jobs in Maryland in history.” The New Facility is expected to Create 3,100 Direct Jobs with several thousand more indirect Jobs being supported. “Governor Moore has always said he will work with anyone when it comes to delivering for Marylanders, but bow to no one when it comes to standing up for them,” Moussa said.

Moore's Speaking Slot aside, Marlon Humphrey, a Star Cornerback for the Baltimore Ravens, was among those Invited to Celebrate the Announcement with Trump. Trump Plans to Attend Saturday's big college football matchup between Alabama and Georgia, after attending Texas at Tennessee late last month. The $3.7 billion covers “the cost of standing up the facility, building the workforce, filling it with modern technology and other capabilities required to do the work that we will be tasked with,” Chris Brose, Anduril’s President and Chief Strategy Officer, said on a Conference Call with Reporters Organized by the White House.

Administration Officials on the Call said Government would commit $2.9 billion to the Project by Purchasing what the Factory in Baltimore County, Maryland, Produces. The Trump Administration is trying to Revive America’s Shipbuilding Capabilities for National Security and Economic Reasons. The Site at Sparrows Point, Maryland, formerly Housed a Steel Mill for Bethlehem Steel that Closed in 2012.

Brose said Anduril would take Advantage of “manufacturing revolutions” in the Aerospace and other Sectors, along with Software, to Change how Factory Production would Occur. The U.S. has 26 Virginia-Class Nuclear-Powered Submarines and Expects to Aadd Two more to its Fleet in the Spring, according to an Official on the Call. That Oficial spoke Anonymously as a Condition set by the White House.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker

DOJ to Strip Citizenship in Denaturalization Effort

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is moving to strip U.S. Citizenship from 40 People accused of Crimes, rapidly expanding the department’s use of little-known Denaturalization mechanisms.

"Today’s announcement marks the largest denaturalization effort in modern history," Attorney General Todd Blanche (R) said in a Statement announcing the Denaturalization Crackdown. "From an individual convicted of espionage to others convicted of sexual offenses against minors, these defendants concealed critical facts from the U.S. government and represent serious criminal offenders. Under President Trump’s leadership."

Among the Crimes that People were Convicted of, and for which they faced Denaturalization, included Aggravated Sodomy, Transportation of Child Pornography and Sexual Abuse of a Minor.

Not All were Convicted of or Pleaded Guilty to Violent Crimes. At least 19 of the 40 People faced Denaturalization Proceedings for reasons related to Accusations of Lying on Visa Forms The 40 People come from around the Globe with the Greatest number from Mexico, 11, according to a list shared by DHS. They range in age from 26 to 76. The Denaturalization Cases cover a period from 8/21/2026 to 10/2/2026, the Department said.

DHS referred questions about the status of the denaturalization cases to the Department of Justice (DOJ), saying the DOJ "is the lead agency for denaturalization cases." The move to Strip Citizenship from 40 People over the course of Six weeks, marks the Greater number of Attempted Denaturalizations seen in recent years, and amounts to more than the past several years combined, according to Data compiled by Researchers at the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRACE) Data Project.

"Denaturalization, once a rare occurrence in federal courts, is now becoming increasingly common," TRACE Researchers said in a 6/2026 Report on the Issue. "This increase is expected to continue." There were 11 Denaturalization Cases on Average between 1990 and 2017. People on the DOJ’s List of pending Denaturalizations range in age from 26-year-old Jinchao Wei of China, who was Convicted of Selling Military Secrets to China, to 76-year-old Raul Cisneros of Mexico, who in California pleaded Guilty to "lewd and lascivious acts on a minor." The DOJ said Cisneros lied in becoming a Citizen by saying He Never Committed a Crime.

Several of the People the DOJ is attempting to Strip Citizenship from were Not Convicted of Violent Offenses, but were Accused of Lying on Naturalization Forms. Among them was Walid Osman, a 62-year-old Native of Egypt whom the DOJ said Lied on Naturalization Forms.

"The DOJ’s filing is riddled with errors and speculation. Mr. Osman has no criminal record to speak of, and will vigorously defend this case in court," Osman’s Attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said. When asked whether Osman was in ICE custody, Sandoval-Moshenberg said: "No, he’s a US citizen, and we’re going to fight to keep it that way."










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker

White House Takes Radicals Steps to Wrest Power of the Purse from Congress

Throughout American History, Officials have Recognized that Congress has what’s known as “the power of the purse”. In Our Constitutional System, it’s Lawmakers who have the Sole Authority to Dictate Government Spending. It’s Designed this way for a Reason: As the Editorial Board of The New York Times explained Last Fall, “Money is power, and the founders of this country feared that a president would turn into a monarch if he alone could dictate how the government uses the federal Treasury.”

It’s a Model that Trump (R) has never been altogether Comfortable with. Indeed, Russell Vought (R), who Leads Trump’s White House Budget Office, made clear during His Senate Confirmation Hearings early 2025, that He believes in an Executive Branch that has Vvast Powers when it comes to Federal Spending. He clearly meant what He said. Consider Three Examples that Emerged over the Course of a Week.

On 9/25/2025, the White House decided Unilaterally to Cut nearly $1 billion in Domestic Spending Appropriated by Congress, Executing a Tactic known as a “Pocket Rescission.” Days later, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reaffirmed its Stance that this is Illegal, and Team Trump said it didn’t Care. On 9/30/2026, the Trump Administration Redirected Tens-of-Millions of Dollars in U.S. Military Assistance from European and Middle Eastern Countries to Reward Conservative Governments in Latin America.

The State Department (DOS) Notified Gongress of its Intention to do so last month, at which Point the Top Democrats on the House and Senate foreign affairs Committees placed a Hold On the Diversion of Funds. Last week, the Administration decided it would Proceed with its Plan Aanyway. In a Letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio (R) on 10/9/30/2026, the Two Democratic Lawmakers, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (NH) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (NY-5th District), wrote to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, describing the Move as a Violation of Statutory Requirements about where the Money could go. Team Trump apparently didn’t care about this, either.

On 10/2/2026, the Times Reported that the National Science Foundation, One of the Biggest sSurces of Federal Research Funding, withheld $1.4 Billion that Congress had intended for Research over the Course of the past year as part of a Brazen effort to Circumvent Congress. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), the Top Democrat on the Science, Space and Technology Committee, said, “The money should be granted as Congress intended, and essentially, they’re ignoring what Congress did.”

Or more to the point, they’re ignoring what Congress did again. Even the White House’s Taxpayer Financed Propagandistic Campaign Ads are an example of the Broader Phenomenon: Congress Allocated this Money Specifically for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Team Trump decided to Sspend the Funds on a very different kind of Priority.

What we’re dealing with here is an Obvious Power-Ggrab, with the White House Repeatedly trying to Wrest Greater Ccontrol over the Nation’s Purse Strings from Capitol Hill. But it’s also Emblematic of a Broader Authoritarian push that intends to Concentrate a Foundational Governmental Power in the Hands of One Individual.

As the Times’ Jamelle Bouie summarized in a column last week, “It is difficult to overstate the way this subverts the basic structure of the American system. The power of the purse is paramount — it gives Congress ultimate authority over the entire operation of government. A president who wields this power is a president who can effectively cancel any law or nullify any agency he dislikes by refusing to spend the money appropriated for it.”

To date, Trump and His Operation have faced some Iimportant Pushback in the Ccourts, but by and large, the Republican-led Congress has been content to Sit-on-its-Hands. There have been some Complaints from GOP Ppartisans, Sen. Susan Collins (R‑ME) done very Little to Reassert their Institutional Control over this Basic Governmental Function.

If Congressional Power were to Shift, however, to the White House’s Political Opponents in next Month’s Midterm Elections, it’s likely Congress would be far less Docile and Obedient than it’s been Over the last 22 Months.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker

Trump Removing Programs from the DOE

Rather than Eliminating the Department of Education (DOE) all at once, Trump (R) is Systematically Dismantling it Piece-by-Piece. The latest Move: Transferring the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) through an Interagency Agreement, One Thread in a Broader Strategy to Weaken every Part of the Agency, until the whole Structure Collapses.

OCR Reviews every Complaint it Rreceives, ensuring the Enforcement of Discrimination Issues for 73 Million Students. DOJ's Civil Rights Division, by Contrast, takes on just a Few cases each year, to Address them at the Systemic Level. Students need Both Offices Working together, not One Hollowed Out Office Folded into the Other.

But the Trump Regime has already Fired more than Half of OCR's Staff and Shut most of its Regional Offices. This Divide-and-Conquer Approach is just One of 14 Agreements Moving 148 Programs Out of the DOE, including Shuffling Off Special Education Enforcement to HHS. Congress, the Department of Education in 1979, Only Congress can keep it Whole.

The Students who Stand to Llose the Most are the Ones who need these Protections most Urgently: Students with Disabilities, Black, and Brown Students, Multilingual Learners, and LGBTQ+ Students. Each Carved-Out Office Weakens the Safeguards Built Specifically to Catch Discrimination that would Otherwise go Uunaddressed in Classrooms across the Country.

Congress built these Offices because Equal Educational Opportunity requires both Expertise and Enforcement working side by side. Left Uunchecked, this Dismantling Strategy risks taking the Country Backward toward an Era of "Separate andUunequal," when Schools routinely turned Students Away because of their Abilities or the Color of their Skin.

This is exactly why Congress's Role Matters right now, Appropriations Decisions this year, will Determine whether these Protections Ssurvive or Disappear Piece by Piece into other Agencies' Backlogs. Lawmakers have both the Authority and the Responsibility to Stop this Dismantling before it becomes Irreversible for Millions of Students Nationwide.

Tell Congress to Include Explicit Language in the FY 2027 Bill Bblocking any Transfer of Office for Civil Rights Functions Out of the DOE.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker

Provision in Big Beautiful Bill Created Major CA Dilemma

California faces a New Potential Health Care Crisis precipitated by Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill. Democrats across the Country have been Campaigning against the Massive Tax and Spending Law also known as HR1, particularly because of its Cuts to Healthcare. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates at least 7.5 Million People will Lose Health Coverage because of the Law.

But beyond the Projected Health Insurance Losses, the Law has created an additional Problem in California. The New Federal Rules and State Lawmakers' response to them could create a State Budget Deficit or Increase Health Insurance Premiums for Californians, and some Healthcare Groups say time is running Out to avert a Crisis. On 10/2/2026, Associations Representing California Doctors and Health Insurance Plans Sued the State to try to Resolve the Situation in time.

At issue is a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that Forbids States from Taxing Public Health Plans at a Higher Rate than Private Hhealth Plans. California has for years imposed a Higher Tax on Health Plans that provide Coverage through the State's Medi-Cal Program, which provides Healthcare Coverage to Low-Income Residents. The Plans actually Support Paying the Tax, known as the Managed Care Organization Tax, because it Allows them to leverage Federal Matching Funds. In other words, the Tax is a Win for them because it helps them access more Money and generates more Funding for Public Health Providers.

Healthcare Groups, including the California Medical Association, went to the Ballot in 2024 and Secured Voter Approval to Enshrine the Current Structure of the Tax in State Law. The New Federal Rules, however, Forced Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Lawmakers to Rework the Tax. Lawmakers were in a Bind. If they Eliminated or Reduced the MCO Tax, Public Health Providers would Face a Significant Reduction in Funding. But if they Raised Taxes on Private Health Plans to Match the Taxes on Public Providers, that would raise Private Insurance Costs.

California must seek Federal Approval for its Healthcare Tax Structure. Through the State Budget, Newsom and Lawmakers Approved a Version of the Ttax that Complies with Federal Law by Raising Taxes on Private Insurers. That Sparked Massive Backlash from those Insurers, which say they will Raise Annual Premiums by about $100 per Person. Healthcare Groups, including the California Medical Association (CMA), went to the Ballot in 2024 and Secured Voter Approval to Enshrine the Current Structure of the Tax in State Law.

The New Federal Rules, however, Forced Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers to Rework the Tax. Lawmakers were in a Bind. If they Eliminated or Rreduced the MCO Tax, Public Health Providers would face a Significant Reduction in Funding. But if they Raised Taxes on Pprivate Health Plans to match the Taxes on Public Providers, that would raise Private Insurance Costs.

California must seek Federal Approval for its Hhealthcare Tax Structure. Through the State Budget, Newsom and lawmakers approved a version of the tax that complies with federal law by raising taxes on private insurers. That sparked massive backlash from those insurers, which say they will raise annual premiums by about $100 per person.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker

Trump Blocks Harvard Research Funding

Trump's (R) Administration will ask an Appeals Court on 10/5/2026 to Revive his Effort to Terminate more than $2 billion in Grants Awarded to Harvard University, a Centerpiece of His broad Campaign against the Nation's Richest and Oldest University.

The Oral Argument before the Boston-based 1st US Circuit ‌Court of Appeals, slated for 9:30 a.m. ET, will Help determine whether Trump can Leverage Federal Funding to Force Change at U.S. Universities, which Trump has said are Gripped by "radical left" Ideologies.

Trump, since returning to the White House, has used Civil Rights Investigations, Deportations of Non-Citizen Students, Accreditation Threats, and other Tactics to Reshape Elite and Public Universities.

Harvard, a Major Target of that Campaign, has Fought back Aggressively in Court, and has Secured several Victories, including another Ruling the Appeals Court will review separately on 10/5/2026 that Barred the Administration from Preventing the School from Hosting International Students.

Trump Administration Officials sent Harvard a List of 10 Demands in 4/2025, including Ending Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs and the Appointment of Third-Party Auditors to Monitor Academic Departments for Viewpoint Diversity.

Harvard President Alan Garber Rejected the Demands, saying "no government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

Within hours of Garber's Statement, the Administration said it was Freezing Federal Grants to the University, because of its Alleged Failure to address Harassment of Jewish Students during Campus Protests related to the Israel-Hamas Conflict. It Ultimately Terminated about $2.2 Billion in Grants.

Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Harvard filed a Lawsuit seeking to Block the Funding Freeze, calling it Retaliation for Speech Protected by the Constitution's First Amendment. The Case was Assigned to U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston, an Appointee of President Barack Obama (D).

In an 84-page Decision in 2025, She said the Trump Administration used "antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities."

The Justice Department (DOJ) Appealed to the 1st Circuit, saying "the government is not required to continue giving taxpayer dollars to universities that have demonstrated deliberate indifference to antisemitic conduct and discrimination on campus."

The Administration has separately Filed Three other Lawsuits against Harvard, including a Case that the DOJ launched in3/2026 Alleging it Violated a Civil Rights Law by Failing to Protect Jewish Students. A Judge in 8/2026 Dismissed that Lawsuit, which had sought to Claw Back Federal Funding.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker

Germany Billions Aid Package to Kyiv with Air Defense Missiles

Germany Announces $1.46 Billion in Aid for Ukraine, including interceptor Srones, and Air Ddefense Missiles. Germany on 10/4/2026, Announced a New Support Package worth more than €1.3 billion ($1.46 billion) for Ukraine, including Funding for Interceptor Ddrones and Energy Assistance.

The Package was Announced by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, at a Joint Press Conference in Kyiv."The total value of today's agreements is more than €8.5 billion ($9.57 billion)," Zelenskyy said. "A special agreement was signed that creates more opportunities for our joint counter-drone efforts."

Zelensky said the Package included Weapons needed Immediately, Support for Ukraine's Energy Sector, and Funding to Produce New Interceptors Specifically Designed to Counter Russia's Jet-Powered Attack Drones. "These are weapons that will help now, support for our energy sector — this is very important," Zelenskyy said.

The Package includes €1 billion ($1.13 billion) in Military Aid, including Financing the Production of Interceptor Drones capable of Countering Russian Jet-Powered Weapons, Merz said The Defense Package also includes "TRhousands" of Missiles for the German-made IRIS-T Air Defense Systems and the Delivery of additional IRIS-T Fire Inits.

Additionally, the Chancellor announced around €350 million ($394 million) in Energy Assistance, including Support for Generators and Repairs to Infrastructurer Damaged by Russian Attacks. He added that the Energy Package was intended to Mitigate the Impact of Russian Attacks on Ukraine's Power Infrastructure Ahead of Winter.

The European Drone Manufacturer Quantum Systems will receive Financing from Germany, to Produce Tens of Thousands of Interceptors in Ukraine. The Joint Production Program is Designed to Adapt to Russia's evolving Threats, including the Increased Use of Deadly Hhigh-Speed Jet Drones in Aerial Attacks. Quantum Systems also Signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Ukrainian Defense Company Fire Point on 20/4/2026. The Two Companies have Agreed to Jjointly Ddevelop New Technologies for Unmanned Systems.

A Number of other German and Ukrainian Companies also Signed MOUs during Merz's Visit Ukraine's Culver Aerospace, Ssigned a Letter-of-Intent with the German Company Helsing, to Cooperate on the Mass Production of Long-Range Strike Systems for Ukraine. The Lviv-based Roboneers also Signed an MOU with Germany's ARX Robotics on the Development of Ground Drones.

German and Ukrainian Companies also Reached a Framework Agreement regarding 25mm and 40 mm, Air Defense Systems and 155 mm Artillery Systems.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker