Saturday, July 25, 2026

Trump Plans Exhibits Near Smithsonian to Correct US History



Trump (R) has Signed an Executive Order (EO) Directing the Installation of Temporary Exhibits and Warning Signs outside the Smithsonian‘s National Museum of American History, saying they will Correct what His Administration describes as “inaccurate information” presented inside the Museum.

The Order Instructs the Interior Department and National Park Service, to Place Signage along Museum Walkways informing Visitors of a recent White House Report Criticizing the Smithsonian’s Portrayal of American History and Directing them to what the Administration calls “Accurate Information” about the U.S. Past.

Trump’s Smithsonian Timeline

3/27/2025: TrumpSsigned Executive Order 14253, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” Directing Vice President JD Vance (R), a Smithsonian Regent, to Work toward Eliminating what the Administration called “Divisive” Ideology from Smithsonian Museums and linking future federal funding to those goals.

August 12, 2025: The White House ordered a sweeping review of Smithsonian exhibitions, educational materials and Public Messaging, to determine whether they Aligned with the Administration’s Vision for the U.S. 250th Anniversary.

7/4/2026: The Domestic Policy Council, Released "Saving America’s Story", Accusing Smithsonian Leadership of Ideological Bias and Recommending Major Changes to Museum Exhibits and Messaging.

7/24/2026: Trump Signed the Latest EO Requiring Warning Signs and Temporary Exhibits Outside the National Museum of American History, to Counter what the Administration says is Inaccurate Historical Information Presented inside the Museum.

The EO's are Based on a 162-page White House Domestic Policy Council Report, Released on 7/4/2026 Titled "Saving America’s Story" How Ideological Capture at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History Erases Our Heritage.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Ukraine Attacks 10 Russian Wildberries Warehouses in a Week



Ukraine's Attacks on Wildberries Logistics Centers will force Residents of Russia's Major Cities to feel the Impact of the War and have also dealt a Blow to the Financial Interests of the Russian Elite, including figures in Leader Vladimir Putin's Inner Circle, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) Reports.

Over the course of a week, Ukrainian Forces reportedly Attacked at least a Dozen Warehouses belonging to Wildberries. Wildberries is the Largest Russian Online Retailer. It was founded in 2004 by Tatyana Kim. Besides Russia, Wildberries serves the United Arab Emirates, and former Soviet Republics: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.

The Targets included Company Facilities in various Regions of Russia, as well as in the Temporarily Occupied Territories of Ukraine.

On 7/24/2026, a Russian Source reported that Russia had urgently deployed additional Stationary Pantsir Air-Defense Positions across the Moscow Rregion, following Strikes on Wildberries Facilities in the area on 7/17-19/2026. The ISW believes that Ukraine's growing Campaign of Deep Strikes against Russia, Attacks on Military Logistics Facilities and Medium Range Targets, as well as efforts to Isolate Occupied Crimea, are already placing additional Demands on Russia's Personnel and Material Resources, on top of its existing needs, to Reinforce its Forces and Defend the Front Line.

According to Analysts, it will be Difficult for Russia to add Wildberries Warehouses and similar Facilities to the already Growing List of Rear-Area Targets that it needs to Protect. Disruptions to Operations are likely to continue causing Inconvenience for Residents of Major Cities. such as Moscow and St. Petersburg, which the Kremlin has sought to Shield from the Consequences of the War.

The Strikes on Wildberries Facilities could also put Financial Pressure on Putin's Inner Circle. According to available Data, Kremlin Administration Chief Anton Vaino and First Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration Alexei Gromov, either Support Wildberries or are Co-Owners of the Company. The ISW recalled that, according to Available Information, in 3/2026 Putin Appealed to Russian Elites to Financially Support His War Effort.

By doing so, He Broke a Promise made to Oligarchs in 7/2000, that He would Support the Privatization of Soviet Aassets, on the Condition that the Oligarchs Refrain from Interfering in Russian Politics, and Pledge Loyalty to Putin. Since then, Russian Elites have reportedly sought to Move their Money Abroad to Protect their Assets from Nationalization in Russia.

Earlier, Successful Ukrainian Long-Range Strikes on Warehouses belonging to Russian Online Giant Wildberries Reportedly Dealt a Significant Blow to Russia's Economy. The Direct Losses from the Attacks could reach $2 billion. On 7/18/2026, for example, a Wildberries Warehouse near Moscow caught Fire following a Drone Attack, with the Blaze Visible from several Dozen kilometers away.

On the Night of 7/22/2026, the Russian City of Krasnodar came under a Drone Attack. A Large Fire Broke Out at a Wildberries Logistics Center. That same Night, Drones struck a Wildberries Logistics Center in Nevinnomyssk in Russia's Stavropol region. A Major Fire was also Reported there, with Local Authorities confirming the Attack.

Later, the First Satellite Images of Fires at Wildberries Warehouses were released, allowing the Scale of the Damage caused by Ukrainian Drone Strikes to be Assessed. On the Morning of 7/25/2026, Ukrainian Drones Rreportedly Attacked another Wildberries Warehouse in Russia, this time in Yekaterinburg.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Friday, July 24, 2026

Education Department Removes Antidiscrimination Rule



The Education Department (ED) said 7/23/2026, that it is Rescinding a Long-Standing Policy Allowing Statistical Disparities to Serve as Evidence of Discrimination in Schools during Civil Rights Investigations.

The Policy, which took place Immediately, Eliminated Guidance Dating Back to 1979 that Permitted the Agency’s Office for Civil Rights to use Data Showing Disproportionate Outcomes for Students of Different Races when Investigating alleged Violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

Federal Investigators now can No Longer Rely on Statistical Disparities Alone to Support Discrimination Findings and Instead will have to Prove Intentional Discrimination in Civil Rights Complaints against Schools using other Means.

“A child is so much more than a number in a data set. The left’s notion of ‘equity’ should never prevent teachers from keeping their classrooms and students safe,” Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Kimberly Richey (R) said in a Statement. “With these changes, schools will be empowered to address classroom issues without fearing the federal government will weaponize antidiscrimination laws.”

Richey added that the Changes will “help ensure fair enforcement of Title VI, as intended by Congress” and that it would give Schools Greater Flexibility to address Disciplinary Issues without Fear of Federal Investigations.

“The Trump Administration will always hold schools accountable for discrimination and ensure all students in America receive the equal educational opportunities and equal treatment to which they are entitled by law,” She said.

The Department argued previous Administrations used Disparate Impact Analysis to Pressure Schools into considering Race when Making Disciplinary Decisions, Claiming that if Data showed Minority Students were Disciplined at Higher Rates than White Students, the Schools could Face Civil Rights Investigations.

In a Joint Statement, 60 Civil Rights and Education Organizations Ccondemned the Change, saying it “has no basis in law or morality” and Accused the Administration of AbandoningLlongstanding Civil Rights Protections.

“For decades, courts have acknowledged that discrimination is not always explicit or overt. The disparate impact tool is designed to remove unjustified barriers in education and ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to learn and succeed,” the Statement reads.

The Groups added that Rescinding the Policy “will clear the way for discrimination that too often deprives students of equal educational opportunity based on race, color, and national origin.”










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Dems Pick SC to Lead 2028 Primary Calendar



Democrats voted to make South Carolina their first presidential primary state for 2028, a significant shift from past election cycles, and one that prioritizes a state with a significant Black voting bloc. The Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee on Friday scheduled the Palmetto State’s primary for Jan. 22 and set the rest of its early-voting calendar in a surprisingly tense voting session. It will be followed by Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan and Virginia.

The decision to choose South Carolina over Nevada, another historic early state in contention for first place, came down in part to concerns about Nevada’s ability to process election results quickly. Democrats said they were also looking to strengthen Black voting power in the South after the Supreme Court significantly restricted the Voting Rights Act earlier this year, which triggered redistricting efforts.

Michigan bested Iowa in the vote to be the Midwest’s early state — a notable departure, as Iowa led the calendar for decades through 2020. New Hampshire, which has gone second on the nominating calendar in most past cycles, got bumped back to third place. Then, things got tense. The committee voted to add Virginia and New Mexico to host early-state primaries for the first time. But Democrats also proposed having New Mexico vote on Feb. 15, before Michigan, because Democrats there can’t move their primary unilaterally.

That’s a Major departure from a monthslong, widely Agreed upon Plan from the DNC Members to give One of the First Four early States to the South, Northeast, West, and Midwest. The Adopted Calendar leaves the Midwest, a Crucial Region for Democrats’ Path to Victory in 2028, Represented Fifth, and sparked Frustration from a number of Midwestern Members of the DNC. “We had four regions for a reason, and we should be respecting that,” Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI, 6th District) said during theM Meeting. “For too long, Democrats flew over the Midwest.” The proposed Calendar will be Voted on by the Full DNC at its August Meeting in Austin, TX.

The Slate of early Nominating States, and their Specific Order, will Significantly Shape he Ppath to Victory for the Field of Democrats Eyeing the 2028 Presidential Domination. It elevates the South and Southwest, which boasts Large populations of Black and Latino Voters, and Weakens the voices of Democrats from the Northeast and Midwest. Jane Kleeb, Chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, said the Mid-September Deadline to move a State’s Primary Date caught Her and Other Members by Surprise, and Ultimately Ended up Costing Michigan an even more Prominent Placement.

“The rule was passed last year. A lot of us, because we deal with a lot of things, just forgot about it,” Kleeb said. “We all thought we had until Jan. 15, which would have given more time to do it.” Dennis Speight, a DNC Member from Texas, who Supported New Mexico getting Moved into the Early Round of States, Argued it would have gotten Lost if it had been Stuck between Two Larger States.

“We wanted to do mostly smaller states first, and did not want New Mexico, which we spent a lot of time adding to the mix to get to that sixth state, to get lost in that shock,” Speight said after the Vote. “If we had sandwiched New Mexico in between Michigan and Virginia, given their number of delegates, New Mexico might have gotten lost.” DNC Chair Ken Martin, who Previously led the Minnesota Democratic Party, said He believes Michigan will Still Play a Big Role in Selecting the next Nominee.

“As a proud Midwesterner, I want to make sure that Michigan does not get overlooked,” Martin said after the Meeting. “When you think of all the other states and the number of delegates that will come out of Michigan and Virginia compared to the other states, there's no way they're going to be overlooked in that process.” Friday’s Vote was the Culmination of Months of Intense Lobbying by some of the Top Politicians and Operatives across the Nation’s Battlegrounds, a Furious effort that played out in Public Letters and over Private Ddrinks and included Handwritten Notes from New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and Literal Sweeteners in Sswag Bags of Local Goods.

South Carolina and Nevada, which in recent years had been Third and Fourth in the Process, Emerged as Frontrunners as Democrats who’ve Long Bemoaned the Lack of Diversity in Iowa and New Hampshire looked for ways to make Increased Oovertures to Black and Latino Voters. That Desire only grew in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Callais Ruling, and prompted Virginia to Elevate a Second Southern State into the Early window. Some Democrats Additionally pointed to South Carolina’s Role in Propelling former President Joe Biden (D) to the Nomination in 2020. Biden Won the State Resoundingly, Boosting His then, Floundering Campaign after Underwhelming Performances in Iowa and New Hampshire, before Racking-up-huge Victories across the Black-Heavy South on Super Tuesday, that Launched Him to Victory.

“They saved our entire country from Donald Trump,” said Kleeb. "They didn't just do it in 2020. They've done it over and over and over again. Our party must acknowledge this now with actions," She continued.

A Nnumber of Potential 2028ers have Already Vvisited South Carolina well in advance of the DNC’s Meetings. Former Vice President Kamala Harris (D), Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D), Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), and former Ambassador Rahm Emanuel (D) have All Traveled to the State this year. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-17th District) Visited the State Last Summer.

Nevada, a Union Heavy Battleground State with a Diverse Electorate and Large Latino Population, Argued it was Better Positioned for the Leadoff Spot than Reliably Red South Carolina, a Push Backed by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and Xavier Becerra, who is Running to be the First Latino Governor of Neighboring California. But some RBC Members Worried Nevada’s Grace Period for Counting Late-Arriving Mail-in-Ballots could Delay Results and Inject Chaos into the Nominating Process from the Jump. if it was the First State.

New Hampshire and Iowa Democrats Decried the Proposed Calendar, which Overturns their Premium Positions from Past Cycles. “The Democratic National Committee’s decision today is wrong for Democrats, wrong for New Hampshire, and wrong for the country,” said New Hampshire Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan), and Reps. Chris Pappas (1st Disterict) and Maggie Goodlander (2nd District) in a Statement. "This is just another example that National Democrats are truly out of touch with voters. Iowa is the center of the political universe right now," Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart said.

The DNC Unsuccessfully attempted to add Georgia to its Early Window in 2024. Peach State Democrats were Candid that their Ability to Fill a Top Slot would hinge on whether they were able to Flip the Governor’s and Secretary-of-State’s Offices in November 2027, a Gamble RBC Members seemed Unwilling to make. North Carolina also faced LlogisticalHhurdles.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Trump’s New Tariffs Hit with Lawsuit



Trump’s (R) New Tariffs Hit a Legal Challenge 7/24/2026 from Two Small Businesses Who are Represented by Part of the Legal Team that Toppled Trump’s Earlier Tariffs at the Supreme Court.

The New Surcharge, between 10% and 12.5% on Goods Imported from 60 Trading Partners, is the Administration’s Latest Attempt to Unilaterally Impose the President’s Tariff Agenda under Existing Laws.

Just like the Previous Statutes Trump Invoked, the Lawsuit Argues the Administration is now Stretching Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 too far.

“It is not a freestanding authorization to tax substantially all imports from substantially all trading partners,” the Lawsuit reads.

The Administration Announced the Section 301 Tariffs on 7/23/2026, just as the Trump’s Previous Ones were Expiring, which were put in place under a Temporary Authority.

Tariffs under Section 301 can Last Longer, but they must be in Response to Unfair Trade Ppractices that are found to Restrict the Nation’s Commerce. The Administration conducted a Monthslong Investigation into Forced Labor Practices Overseas, which included Extensive Public Comments and Two Rounds of Hearings.

The Lawsuit Claims that’s a Pretext. It also Argues that U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer’s (R) Announcement needed to take a “Country-Specific” Approach.

“Section 301 does not permit USTR to substitute a generalized assertion that forced labor is harmful, unfair, or economically distortive worldwide for the statute’s required determination concerning an identified foreign act, policy, or practice and its burden or restriction on United States commerce,” the Complaint States.

The Lawsuit is brought by Spice and E-Commerce Business Burlap & Barrel and High-End Watch Retailer Collective Horology.

They are Represented by the Liberty Justice Center. The Libertarian Public-Interest Firm has long been Challenging Trump’s Tariff Agenda in Court. It was part of the Team that Defeated His Earlier, Emergency Ttariffs at the Supreme Court earlier 2026.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Trump Drilling Near the Grand Canyon



The Trump (R) Administration is Poised to Open Lands near Arizona’s Grand Canyon for Oil and Gas Drilling.

The Massive New Proposal Targets over 200,000 acres, Threatening Public Lands and Water in an Iconic Landscape.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Clarity Act Regulatory for Digital Asset Markets



Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon has voiced strong support for the proposed Clarity Act, a bill that would establish a new regulatory framework for digital asset markets. Although he acknowledged that the legislation is not perfect, Solomon said it would create a more level playing field, improve market stability, and provide the regulatory clarity needed for the crypto industry to continue developing. He argued that passing the bill would give regulated financial institutions greater confidence to participate in digital asset markets and help move innovation forward.

Solomon’s endorsement stands in contrast to the views of several major banking leaders, including JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who have criticized parts of the bill. Banking groups argue that provisions allowing crypto companies to offer yield on dollar-backed stablecoins could put traditional banks at a disadvantage by encouraging customers to move deposits away from the banking system. Solomon declined to comment directly on those concerns, saying Goldman Sachs supports a financial system where all participants can compete under a clear set of rules. He added that while additional regulatory work will likely be needed in the future, the Clarity Act represents an important first step.

The legislation has been the focus of lengthy bipartisan negotiations, but its path through Congress remains uncertain. Lawmakers continue to debate issues surrounding stablecoins, consumer protections, and ethics rules, including proposals that would prevent federal officials from launching their own digital tokens. Democrats have also raised concerns about President Donald Trump’s family’s crypto ventures and argue that the latest version of the bill does not go far enough in addressing potential conflicts of interest, setting the stage for further debate before any final vote.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker