Saturday, March 21, 2026

20 US Airports don’t Use TSA



At 20 Airports in the U.S., Security Screening is Handled by Private Companies, and their Checkpoints aren’t seeing Long Lines.

The Private Companies have Avoided Absences Airports that use Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Staff are Struggling with Right Now during the Partial Government Shutdown.

The Government Employed Screeners have Not been Paid in more than a Month, as Congress Remains Locked in a Stalemate over Funding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) due to Immigration Reform.

All Private Airport Security Operations remain under Federal Oversight and Must Comply with the same Rules TSA Agents Follow. The Companies do get to Decide how many People to Hire and what to Pay them. The Security Screeners with Private Companies Receive the same type of Training as TSA.

For an Airport to Implement Private Screening, it must First get Permission from TSA. If Approved, a Contract could be Issued. TSA would Select the Company that could take over within Six Months.

The Transition and Application Process might Bar Larger Aairports to Opt-In, as they might have a “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” Attitude, Jeffries said.

American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the Uunion which Represents TSA Screeners, says Contracts, usually Awarded to the Lowest Bidder, Compromise the Safety of the Traveling Public, Incentivize Companies to Prioritize Profit over Passengers or Employees, and Actually cause Staff Shortages.

Airports with Private Airport Security:

Atlantic City International Airport; New Jersey
Charles M. Schulz–Sonoma County Airport; California
Dawson Community Airport; Montana
Great Falls International Airport; Montana
Glacier Park International Airport; Montana
Greater Rochester International Airport; New York
Havre City-County Airport; Montana
Kansas City International Airport; Missouri
L. M. Clayton Airport; Montana
Orlando Sanford International Airport; Florida
Portsmouth International Airport; New Hampshire
Punta Gorda Airport; Florida
Roswell International Air Center; New Mexico
San Francisco International Airport; California
Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport; Florida
Sidney-Richland Municipal Airport; Montana
Sioux Falls Regional Airport; South Dakota
Tupelo Regional Airport; Mississippi
Wokal Field/Glasgow International Airport; Montana
Yellowstone Airport; Montana










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Ukraine is Suddenly on the Offensive



When Elon Musk Flipped the Off Switch on Russian Forces’ Starlink Internet Connections in February, Ukraine’s Military went on the Offensive. Russian Commanders had Lost Access to Live Video of the Battlefield and Communications with Troops. Ukrainian Soldiers moved in on Russian Positions with Little Threat from Drones normally an Omnipresent Danger.

Now, Ukrainian Forces have Notched their Biggest Domestic Territorial Gains in more than Two years, Dashing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Efforts to gain Leverage in U.S.-Mediated Talks. Ukrainian Advances following Russia’s Loss of Starlink, the Aatellite Internet Service of Musk’s SpaceX, Underscore how Vital the Commercial Satellite Internet System has become in Modern Warfare and the Control that Musk Himself is able to Exercise over the Conflict.

At the start of 2/2026, SpaceX went Live with a System that Only Allowed Starlink Systems on an Approved “White List” to Access the Internet in Ukraine. Starlink Systems Owned by Ukrainian Forces were Approved, while Russian Ones Weren’t. Since then, Ukraine says it has Retaken roughly 150 square miles of Territory in the Southern Zaporizhzhia and Dnipropetrovsk Regions, where Russian forces had Previously been Advancing Rapidly. 2/2026 was the First Month since 2023 when Kyiv Regained more Territory in Ukraine than it Lost.

Across the Whole of the Front Line, Russia still Holds an Advantage, including a 3-to-1 edge in Troop Numbers, according to Ukraine’s Top General. Emil Kastehelmi, Co-Founder of Black Bird Group, a Defense and Intelligence Analysis Organization, Noted that most of the Territory Ukraine had Regained was Open Fields and Small Villages. But the Ukrainian Advances have provided a Timely Boost to a Nation that has been Fighting Off the Russian Invasion for more than Four years, and Survived a Winter with Widespread Power and Heating Cuts.

Front-Line Soldiers say that, while there were Other Factors that enabled Kyiv’s Counterattack, the Russian Loss of Starlink was Essential to their Advances. “It came at a critical moment,” said a Soldier who goes by the Call Sign Konosh, from the Timur Special Forces Unit in Ukraine’s Military Intelligence Directorate. “Without Starlink, they were basically pushed back to Cold War-era communications.”

Although Starlink isn’t Active in Russia, Moscow’s Forces had been Obtaining Terminals from Unauthorized Middlemen who sent them from other Countries. Over the past several Years, Starlink became Essential to Both-Sides in the Conflict, according to Ukrainian Troops and Independent Analysts. At Command Posts, Russian Officers would Watch Live Drone Feeds and Deploy Resources based on what they Saw. The System let them Coordinate Instantly and Securely with Drone Pilots, who would then Dispatch Waves of Attack Drones at Ukrainian Targets.

Once Starlink was Cut-Off, however, Ukrainian Troops Noticed a Dramatic Drop in the Number of Drones coming after them. “Before, if the enemy spotted our group, even a single soldier, they wouldn’t let him go. They would throw everything at him,” said Oleksiy Serdiuk, the Commander of the Brotherhood Unit of the Timur Special Forces Unit.

He Recalled a Time in 2/2026 when the Russians Spotted a Group of Ukrainian Soldiers in a House. Two Drones soon Struck-It, but No others Followed immediately, because Commanders couldn’t Quickly Communicate the Position to other Drone Pilots, giving the Ukrainian Troops Time to move to a New Position. “That gap between detecting the target and reacting has become critical for them,” He said. Certain Equipment that Relied heavily on Starlink, like Ground Drones, also became far Less Useful, according to Ukrainian Troops.

In addition, Russian Commanders had gotten Used to Sending Instructions to Infantrymen about where to Move. An Officer in Ukraine’s Russian Volunteer Corps in the Timur Special Forces Unit, who goes by the Call-Sign Sever, said Captured Russian Soldiers told them they were Sometimes Deployed with a Starlink Device and “had to send video confirmation of their location to prove they hadn’t deserted.”

“With Starlink, they tightly controlled units,” Sever said. “That level of control is now gone. Without Starlink, those soldiers are isolated. They don’t know what’s happening outside the houses where they’re hiding.” Though Ukraine Aannounced the New “White List” System for Starlink before it took Effect, Troops in the Zaporizhzhia Region said the Russians were Completely Unprepared when they Lost Access to it.

In the First Week, Ukrainian Officers said, the Russian Commanders kept Telling Soldiers the Connection would be Restored Soon. Troops repeatedly tried to Reboot their Terminals, which then Helped Ukrainian Forces Detect their Locations and Hit them. Without Starlink, Russia was Forced to rely much more Heavily on Radio Traffic, which, unlike Communications over Starlink, Ukraine was able to Intercept.

“We started hearing direct instructions in the radio traffic,” said a Signals-Intelligence Specialist for the Timur Unit. “Where units should move, which settlements they were going to enter, what routes to take. Sometimes we heard a day ahead.” Ukraine’s Counter-Offensive in the Zaporizhzhia Region had already begun when Russia Lost Starlink, and Kyiv’s Forces saw an Opportunity to Sow further Chaos.

Ukraine sent Small Groups to Attack Russian Rear Positions, hoping that the Russians would Believe a much Larger Force had Broken through. “It gave us a real advantage—we were able to exploit weaknesses at a moment when their system of control was destabilized,” said One Company Commander in the Ukrainian Army. “In intercepted communications, we could hear calls to abandon positions, because they believed our forces had already broken through.” During the First Weeks of Russia’s Starlink Outage, Ukraine was able to Push the Russians Back from the Outskirts of Zaporizhzhia, the Regional Capital, Sparing the City from Assaults from most Artillery. However, Moscow is now building Workarounds. Ukrainian Troops said Russian Forces were Running Communication Cables between Positions, and using Shorter-Range Wireless Internet Systems and Russian and Chinese Satellite Services.

Russian Forces are also Working to Find Ukrainians who will Help them Register Starlink Terminals on the White List. Ukraine’s Security Services have already Arrested Two Ukrainian Citizens in Connection with these Efforts. So far, None of the Workarounds have Proved as Effective as Starlink, according to Troops and Analysts. Ukrainian Troops estimated that since Losing Starlink, the Russians had Recovered around 60% over their Previous Level of Coordination.

Michael Kofman, a Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, D.C., said Ukrainian Forces are Now Hunting the Internet Bridges Russia is Using: “Russian forces try to adapt by employing mesh networks and modems, but Starlink was a cheap and effective solution,” He said.

In addition, Moscow’s Forces are having an Internal Fight about which Communications Systems Troops should use. The Kremlin has Moved to Ban Troops from using Telegram, an Independently Owned Messaging App Popular within the Armed Forces, In Favor of a State-Owned System called Max. However, Military Commanders have been Reluctant to Switch, because they don’t want Russia’s Federal Security Service, which owns Max, Reading their Communications.

That Conflict could Present more Problems ahead for the Russians, as they Work-Out their Front-Line Communications. “The army won’t grind to a halt just because Telegram gets cut off, but there will be problems,” said Serhiy Beskrestnov, an Adviser to Ukraine’s Defense Minister.

“Problems will arise in coordinating work between groups, coordinating operations at the lowest tactical levels—platoon, company, battalion.”










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Presidents Cannot Stop Midterm Elections



The U.S. President Does Not have Constitutional or Statutory Authority to Cancel or Ppostpone Federal Elections.

This Power Lies with Congress.

While States may have Limited Emergency Powers to Reschedule Elections, these do Not Grant the President the Authority to Hhalt Elections Nationwide.

Any attempt by the President to do so, would Face Significant Legal Challenges, and would likely be Met with Pushback from Congress, and the Courts.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Southern Border Wall Expansion Underway



The Trump (R) Administration is Building Hundreds-of-Miles of Border Wall through Iconic National Parks, Public Lands, and Ecologically Sensitive Wilderness, Empowered by Provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill, that provided $46.5 billion in Funding and a 2005 Law that Waived Dozens of Environmental Rules for Border Security Projects.

The “Smart Wall” Project calls for a Wall in Parts of Rugged Texas Desert that are experiencing Hhistorically Low Border Crossings and a Second Wall across parts of: Arizona, California, and New Mexico, that Already have Barriers from the First Trump Administration, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Documents.

The Aggressive Pace, Three New Miles of Wall a Week, has Alarmed Advocates and National Parks Staff, who say the Construction will Destroy Pristine Country, Threaten Endangered Species, and Cut-Off Access to Sacred Indigenous and Archaeological Sites. And it has Sparked an Unusual Degree of Bipartisan Pushback, with Sheriffs, Conservative County Judges, Environmentalists, and Texas State Lawmakers Lobbying Trump Officials to Change Course.

“This is one of the largest public works projects in recent history for the U.S.,” said Eamon Harrity, Wildlife Program Manager for Sky Island Alliance, a Conservation Nonprofit based in Tucson. “It’s fairly scary to think about the lack of oversight, the complete authority to build these walls without considering the environmental impacts.”

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued Waivers under the 2005 REAL ID Act, allowing the Department to Disregard the Wall’s Impact on Plants and Animals normally Protected by the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Project is Exempted from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a Sweeping Law that Mandates an Extensive Review of a Federal Action’s potential Impacts and Public Consultation that can take Years.

Sorting through Complicated Legal and Property Ownership Issues, Slowed Down Border Wall Construction in Texas, during the First Trump Administration. But the Federal gGvernment is now Skipping Meetings with Local Officials and Landowners, and Awarding Contracts to Out-of-State Firms. Last month, the Army Corps of Engineers sent Packets to Texas Landowners along the Wall’s Path containing Maps showing the Land they Planned to Take. The Proposed Construction could include anything from Ground Sensors and Infrared Cameras to 30-foot Steel Bollards affixed with Floodlights and Gravel Roads for Border Patrol Vehicles, and often All of These.

Big Bend National Park has Emerged as a Political Flash Point in the New Expansion, with many Landowners and Conservationists describing a Border Wall as an Unnecessary Encroachment from Big Government seizing One of the Last Vestiges of Unspoiled Freedom and Frontier. On a recent Afternoon Charlie Angell, 59, who runs Ecotourism Canoe Trips, pointed to the Expanse of Dinosaur-Age Limestone Canyons carved by the Jade-colored Waters of the Rio Grande stretching beyond His Home near Redford, Texas. “This was where I planned on finishing my life,” Angell said. “Now I may lose my business, my home and my way of life. I guess I have to start over?”

Building a Physical Wall along the 1,954 miles of Land that Divides the U.S. and Mexico has long been a Pillar of Trump’s Border Security Agenda. But during His First Term Federal Officials devoted most of their Time and Resources to Replacing Close to 500 miles of Existing Infrastructure, largely on Federal Land that Attracted a Large Number of Border Crossers. In all, only about 80 miles of New Barrier were Installed.

Federal Officials Razed Smaller Barriers in Environmentally Sensitive Locations like Arizona’s Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument and Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and put in 30-foot-Tall Steel Border Wall instead. Human Smugglers and Migrants Sawed through it, Climbed over it or, on Occasion, Fell from it. President Biden (D) said He would Not Build “another foot” of Wall, even as Illegal Border Crossings Surged to Record Levels. But His Administration said it was Legally Obligated to Uuse the Appropriated Funds to Finish Work on 20 miles of Wall in South Texas, Fill in Gaps elsewhere, and Repair Concrete Llevees Supporting the Slats.

Now, Despite Illegal Crossings Dropping to Historic Lows, DHS and the Defense Department Plan to Construct more than 1,350 Miles of New Border Wall in the Southwest, according to Analysis of CBP Data. In addition to more than 750 miles of Primary Wall and roughly 600 Miles of Secondary Wall, CBP is Planning for more than 500 miles of Water Barriers, such as Buoys, the Data shows. Cameras, Lights, and other Surveillance Technology would Complement the Physical Barriers in many Places, with some Areas without Walls covered by Sensors.

The Trump Administration has Issued at least $22 billion in Contracts to Construction Crews. “This border wall actually makes every single agent more effective,” said CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott (R) during a 2/2026 News Conference. “Every investment we make in infrastructure and technology across all of CBP lets the actual agent, the human being, do things that only the human being can do.”

The New Wall would include Physical Barriers along 62 miles of Arizona Tribal Lands, and up to 175 miles in Texas’s Big Bend Region. Critics say the Secondary Wall would Create a “no man’s land” between the Two Segments that will Exacerbate Dangers. Border Residents say that in Regions as Remote as the Big Bend, Maintaining Roads for Agents, Greater Broadband Access and Other Technology can Enhance Border Security better than a Wall. “We are killing a gnat with a sledgehammer and wasting a colossal amount of money,” said Republican Brewster County Judge Greg Henington.

Outgoing DHS Secretary Kristi L. Noem (R) has said that when Americans Elected Trump, they Voted for a Border Wall that will “continue to protect us for generations to come.” Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), whom Trump has tapped to Succeed Her, also Supports the Construction. Texas Leaders and those Living in the Big Bend Region said they always thought they would be Exempt. Trump has described the Rugged Terrain as being Gifted with “natural boundaries.” The Arid Landscape, with its Sheer Cliffs, Punishing Heat, Water Scarcity, Predators, and Rugged Mountains, saw Significant Increases, 89,000 Encounters, in Unauthorized Migration during Biden’s Term. But that Number was a Small Fraction of the Millions of Illegal Crossings Overall.

“Do people cross here? Yes,” said Terrell County Sheriff Thaddeus Cleveland, a former Border Patrol Agent who joined Four other Regional Sheriffs last week in Opposing a Border Wall through the Big Bend National and State Parks, which at 800,000 and 300,000 Acres respectively Span a Territory nearly the Size of the State of Delaware. “But they have a three-to-four-to-five-day walk often to get to the highway to get picked up.” Brewster County Sheriff Ronny Dodson, whose Jurisdiction includes Big Bend National Park, said Exhausted Border Crossers often Hail His Truck in need of Rescue after getting Lost or Running Out of Water. Dodson said GPS-enabled Drones, Surveillance Beacons or Improved Broadband could Help secure the Border better than any Wall ever could. Since Trump entered Office, He said, Encounters are near Zero in the Big Bend. “Whatever he did to shut the border down,” He said, “Trump shut it down pretty good.”

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Published an Interactive Map late last year Indicating where Construction had begun and where Crews would soon begin work. But it wasn’t until the Local Newspaper, the Big Bend Sentinel, publicized the News in February that the Wall would be Built through the National Park there that Local Officials started Calling State Lawmakers, in an effort to Lobby the White House. Residents Panicked on Social Media, and soon the Alarm was Reverberating among Southwest Nonprofits, Businesses and Environmentalists.

Tourism Generates more than $54 million for the Local Economy, largely from Hotel Occupancy Taxes, Recreation and Food Sales. More than a Half Million Visitors flock to the State and National Parks Annually to Canoe the Rio Grande, Hike the Canyons, and Indulge in the Delightful Oddities of a place 100 miles from any big city. That isolation has fostered a sense of community between the U.S. and Mexican towns on either riverbank, which a Wall could Sever. For $5, Park Tourists are Ferried by Boat across the Rio Grande to a Pen of Burros waiting to carry them into Boquillas for another $15 to Eat Tacos, Buy Souvenirs, and Drink Mexican Beer.

At Big Bend National Park’s Hot Springs, Sunbathers can Swim 40 feet to the Mexican Shore and Buy $10 Tamales from a Family that Prepares Them beneath a Thatched Hut. “Nosotros vivimos de esto,” said Juany Ramirez, a Boquillas Resident Selling Hand-Sewn Tortilla Warmers and Beer Koozies that say “No Wall” in Blue and Red thread. “We survive on this.”

Billy Bartko, who Offers Jeep Tours and River Trips, said that if the Wall is Constructed it could Cut His Sales by 75% and Deter many Workers who Cross over from Mexico via the River. Bartko is among several :ocals Pushing to Designate the Region a Dark Sky Destination, which would Protect Stargazing views from Light Pollution, to Draw more People to the Region for Epic Stargazing and Astronomical Research. Any Installation of Bright Lights for Border Security would also Sink those Aspirations.

Any Wall Construction, Local Leaders said, could also Interfere with the Hydrology of the Rio Grande. Contractors would bring in Equipment, Stage Material, Tear-Up Local Roads and Stress the Local Infrastructure already Burdened by Hundreds of Active-Duty Soldiers. “We are standing on the brink of oblivion,” said John Kennedy, who serves as the Economic Development Chief for the Majority-Hispanic City of Presidio, and has Ssought to Discuss the Border Wall Plan with State and Federal Leaders.

Construction of physical barriers in the fragile ecosystems of remote Arizona, New Mexico and Texas could deplete scarce groundwater resources and disturb animal migration patterns and other plants and wildlife, according to wildlife experts and other scientists. In Texas, a small but growing black bear population in the Chiso Mountains of Big Bend depends on the annual influx of male bears from Mexico to sustain the population, according to retired National Park Service wildlife biologist Raymond Skiles.

Likewise, smaller groups of jaguars, antelope and bighorn sheep that live on one side of the border would be unable to pass through the border wall to find food and water to survive and link up with the main populations to reproduce, said Aaron Flesch, a research scientist at the University of Arizona. “A jaguar is not going to climb a nine-meter border wall,” Flesch said. “Cutting off two or three isolated individuals that are in the U.S. from the many thousands to the south is going to basically end any potential for that population to recover, without human intervention.”

Crews have already drilled wells with capacity to pump more than a million gallons of water per day to support construction of one section of wall near Tucson. LED lights, which are described in CBP project documents for a 222-mile section of border, could disorient animals like bats, birds and insects, said Harrity, the Arizona conservationist.

The DHS waivers allow the wall to be built without first studying and minimizing these environmental harms, as is normally required. “The Secretary’s waiver minimizes the risk of project delays and, in turn, puts DHS in a better position to continue to progress towards a secure southern border,” the CBP website says.

The double wall in Arizona is expected to be built 150 to 200 feet north of the existing wall. It could run through the Quitobaquito Springs in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument and would probably trap animals, said three Interior Department staffers who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they fear being fired. The site contains the only surface water within hundreds of miles on the U.S. side of the border, making it critically important to local wildlife and Native Americans, said Lorraine Marquez Eiler, an elder of the Hia-ced O’odham Indigenous people.

Native Americans have used the springs for thousands of years, living there intermittently. The springs are also home to the only U.S. populations of endangered Sonoyta mud turtles and Quitobaquito pupfish. The water level there fell as groundwater was pumped to build the first border wall. Heavy machinery reshaping the landscape could also disrupt their only remaining habitat, leading their populations to dwindle further toward extinction.

Three Interior employees said they fear the second wall will make it even more difficult to fight stinknet, a foul-smelling invasive plant with yellow ball-shaped flowers. In the neighboring Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, the structure would also run through an Indigenous grave site and an intaglio, a ground etching thought to look like a fish that was probably used for ceremonies more than 1,000 years ago.

“When we’re approaching America’s 250th birthday this year,” said Cary Dupuy, Texas regional director for the National Parks Conservation Association, “what does it mean to take care of the places that we said we were going to protect?” The bipartisan pushback in Texas may be prompting Trump officials to change their plans when it comes to Big Bend National Park.

At least 132 Local Businesses and Organizations sent a Letter to Congress, asking the Appropriations Committee to Stop the Use of Federal Funds for a Project that would cause Irreversible Damage to the “integrity of our natural heritage.” Texas Oilman Rush Warren (R) said He Understands the Need for a Wall Elsewhere, but Not in the National Park: “It seems to me that whatever we’re doing is working. So why do we need a wall here?”

In Terlingua, Residents Packed the Cinnabar Theatre on a recent Evening ready to Mobilize. They have Written Lawmakers, formed Committees to Contact People who have come as Tourists and Posted on Social Media. Archaeologist David Keller, who has Surveyed the Region’s Artifacts, Burial sites and Cultural Significance, Encouraged the Community to be Disciplined but Firm if Construction Crews come to Town. “We can be civil,” He said. “But we don’t have to be nice.”

In early March, the CBP released a New Map that seemed to Indicate a Physical Barrier would No Longer be Constructed in the National Park. Instead, only “detection technology” would be used. Some in the Community declared victory after seeing the Change. This month, CBP Solicited Public Comment on the Plan, with the Window Closing in 4/2026.

Andrew Mahaleris (R), a Spokesman for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), said in a Statement that Abbott would Prefer that the Trump Administration Deploy “technology to aid in securing the border” in Isolated areas like Big Bend, instead of a New Wall. But Mahaleris added that Texas will Support and Assist the Trump Administration in “deterring, arresting, detaining and deporting illegal immigrants.”

Asked whether the Uupdated Map indicates the CBP is Reconsidering whether to Build a Physical Barrier in Big Bend or a Neighboring State Park, the Agency said it is still Developing and Finalizing its Plan. Local Guide Mike Davidson, who fell in love with the Big Bend Area as a Visitor more than 50 years ago, said He doesn’t Trust the Federal Government to be Transparent about its Plans and Fears it is setting a Dangerous Precedent for Protected Lands.

“It’s like putting a giant billboard in Yellowstone or Yosemite,” the 73-year-old said. “They’re going to violate everything that a national park stands for and for a very small reward.”










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Friday, March 20, 2026

US Pauses Sanctions on Some Iran’s oil



Sanctions on some Iranian Oil will be Temporarily Lifted, to Allow the Sale of Shipments already in Transit, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (R) announced 3/20/2026.

The Partial Pause on Sanctions is Intended to Help Ease what the Administration sees as a Short-Term Shock to the Global Market as a Result of the Attack on Iran launched by the U.S. and Israel Three Weeks Ago.

Bessent said in a Social Media Post, that the U.S. is Granting a Short-Term Authorization to Allow the Sale of about 140 million Barrels of Iranian Oil in Transit.

“In essence, we will be using the Iranian barrels against Tehran to keep the price down as we continue Operation Epic Fury,” He said.

Oil Prices have Spiked to over $100 per Barrel since the U.S. Launched Airstrikes on Iran Last Month, Triggering a Rise in Gas Prices. Israeli Strikes on Iran’s Vast Offshore Gas Field and by Iran’s Closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a Critical Trade Passage that Facilitates a Significant Share of the World’s Oil and Natural Gas Trade, have Helped Drive the Increases. Bessent did Not Specify how Long the Sanctions would be Placed on Hold.

The Announcement Marks a Partial Reversal of the Long Standing Aggressive Economic Pressure Campaign by the U.S. intended to Weaken Iran’s Economy, though Bessent said the Country would have “difficulty accessing any revenue generated” from the Sales. “The United States will continue to maintain maximum pressure on Iran and its ability to access the international financial system,” He Added.

Trump appeared to Acknowledge He was Aware that Entering a War with Iran could Cause Oil Prices to Spike, even as He touted the Success of the U.S. Military Operation and the Strength of the Economy. “I expected it worse actually,” He told Reporters at the White House on Friday. “I thought that oil prices would go much higher.

Bessent said He’s Confident the Suspension of Sanctions on Iran will Benefit the U.S. Economy in the Long-Run.

“Any short-term disruption now will ultimately translate into longer-term economic gains for Americans — because there is no prosperity without security,” He said.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (Dd-NH), the Ranking Member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in Response that the Easing of Sanctions gives the Iranian Government “A Financial Lifeline” as Americans “continue to feel the impact” of the War.

“To say the President has no plan is an understatement,” Shaheen said.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Judge Rules Pentagon Restrictions on Press Unconstitutional



A Federal Judge Rossed Parts of the Pentagon’s Restrictions on News Outlets, saying they Violated the First Amendment, in a Lawsuit brought by The New York Times.

The Judge on 3/20/2026 Ruled that the Pentagon’s Restrictions on News Outlets Violate the First Amendment and Issued an Order Tossing Parts of the Department’s Policy, in the Times Suit in 12/2025 over the Restrictions.

Judge Paul Friedman, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, also Ordered the Pentagon to Restore the Press Passes of Seven Journalists for The Times. They had Surrendered those Passes on 10/2026 instead of Signing the Policy, which Empowered the Pentagon to Declare Journalists “Security Risks” and Revoke their Press Passes if they Engage in any Conduct that the Pentagon believes Threatens National Security.

The Pentagon Policy took Effect in 10/2025, and drew Condemnations from Numerous Mainstream Outlets for Penalizing Newsgathering Methods Long Protected by the First Amendment. Dozens of journalists who had Press Passes to the Pentagon turned them In, rather than Sign the New Policy. The Defense Department then Wwelcomed a New Set of Credentialed Media Members, most of them Pro-Trump Commentators or Influencers.

At a 3/6/2026 Hearing in the Case, Judge Friedman Signaled His Frustration with the Rules. A Justice Department Lawyer, Representing the Defense Department, for instance, Drew an Animated Rresponse from the judge, when He Argued that Journalists don’t have First Amendment Protections when they Solicit the “disclosure of unauthorized information.”

“Why not?” Judge Friedman Rreplied, adding that Department Officials can Simply Refuse to Answer such Inquiries from Journalists, but there is “No Proscription” on Journalists asking Questions.

Judge Friedman had also Appeared Skeptical of a Provision in the Policy Declaring Off-Limits certain Journalistic Tip Requests. Though the Pentagon Drew a bright line, delineatingpProhibited Tip requests from Problematic Ones, Judge Friedman said, “I don’t understand that argument. I hope that the government can explain it.”

It is Unclear whether the Government will Appeal the Rruling. In the Hearing, the Justice Department asked that the court send the Rules back to the Defense Department for Refining, so that the Pentagon could “Rehabilitate the Policy”, rather than Vacate the Disputed Provisions.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


Russia Up in Flames



Ukraine Launched One of the Largest Drone Attacks on Moscow in 2026, Hitting the Russian Capital, and Surrounding Regions with Hundreds of FP-1 Drones.

Airports are Closed, Explosions are Reported across the City, and Oil Depots in Krasnodar Krai are Burning.

With Russia Struggling to Maintain Control of the Narrative, Ukraine’s Aerial Strategy is sending a Clear Message to Putin: Moscow is now within Range, and the War is coming Home.

Russia entered the War with far more Combat Aircraft and every Expectation that it would Quickly Dominate Ukraine’s Skies. Instead, its Air Force faced a Problem that looked Small on Paper but Proved far more Dangerous in Practice.

Ukraine’s Surviving Mobile Air Defenses. Russia’s Larger Air Force still could Not Secure Air Superiority, It Missed SEAD Operations that left Pilots to Fly Low and Vulnerable, and why Failing to Destroy Missile Systems, Shaped the Entire Opening Phase of the War.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker