Use the above link to read the possible wordings for an amendment, other FAQ's, and to sign a petition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fec31/fec3143d38f28a68cb247ea1d52e53c4ca1f40a1" alt=""
NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!
Michael H. Drucker
The Internet has made this the age of the instant political movement. Like-minded people (and even unlike-minded people) can find one another and quickly create a kind of critical mass. The hope, often the expectation, is that these new aggregations can bring positive change to the body politic. This includes seizing new opportunities for democratizing communication and communicating democracy, both of which are urgently needed.
2 comments:
It is not true that the US Supreme Court in Citizens United ruled that corporations and unions have the same rights of free speech as individuals. That principle has been settled law since 1964, when the NY Times won its libel case against certain officials in Mississippi. The NY Times is a corporation. Also, in 1978, the US Supreme Court had ruled that corporations have the same free speech right as individuals to spend money on ballot measures.
If groups don't have free speech rights, then the government would be free to censor political parties, and churches, and political advocacy groups like Independent Voting.
My problem with the ruling is they did not take into account that the owners' of the public company is the public and the public does have a say in how their money is spent.
Post a Comment