Showing posts with label The Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Show all posts

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Paper Showing Discriminatory Effect of Voter ID Laws


Researchers have warned that laws requiring voters to show certain forms of photo identification at the poll would discriminate against racial minorities and other groups.

Now, the first study has been released showing that the proliferation of voter ID laws in recent years has indeed driven down minority voter turnout, and by a significant amount.

In a new paper entitled “Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes”, researchers:

- Zoltan Hajnal, University of California, San Diego
— Nazita Lajevardi, University of California, San Diego
— Lindsay Nielson, Bucknell University

used data from the annual Cooperative Congressional Election Study to compare states with strict voter ID laws to those that allow voters without photo ID to cast a ballot.

They found a clear and significant dampening effect on minority turnout in strict voter ID states. “Democratic turnout drops by an estimated 8.8 percentage points in general elections when strict photo identification laws are in place,” compared to just 3.6 percentage points for Republicans.

The analysis shows that strict photo identification laws have a differentially negative impact on the turnout of Hispanics, Blacks, and mixed-race Americans in Primaries and General elections. Voter ID laws skew democracy in favor of whites and those on the political right.

Note: An updated version of the paper, not currently available on the web, includes data from the 2014 elections.

Do not know if this paper is in draft form that was peer reviewed yet.

CLICK HERE to read the 34 page (PDF) web paper.











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
Digg! StumbleUpon

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Non-Citizens and the November Election



The Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) is a 50,000+ person national stratified sample survey administered by YouGov/Polimetrix.  Half of the questionnaire consists of Common Content asked of all 50,000+ people, and half of the questionnaire consists of Team Content designed by each individual participating team and asked of a subset of 1,000 people.  In addition, several teams may pool their resources to create Group Content.

Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens?

Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself.

In a forthcoming article by: Jesse Richman a Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University and Director of the ODU Social Science Research Center, David Earnest a Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters, in the journal Electoral Studies, bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections.  Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote.  But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.

The data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES).  Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010.  For the 2008 CCES, they also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that they could verify whether they actually voted.

How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections?  More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote.  Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted.  Their best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), they find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.  Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.

They also found that one of the favorite policies advocated by conservatives to prevent voter fraud appears strikingly ineffective.  Nearly three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have subsequently voted.

An alternative approach to reducing non-citizen turnout might emphasize public information.  Unlike other populations, including naturalized citizens, education is not associated with higher participation among non-citizens.  In 2008, non-citizens with less than a college degree were significantly more likely to cast a validated vote, and no non-citizens with a college degree or higher cast a validated vote.  This hints at a link between non-citizen voting and lack of awareness about legal barriers.

The research cannot answer whether the United States should move to legalize some electoral participation by non-citizens as many other countries do, and as some U.S. states did for more than 100 years, or find policies that more effectively restrict it.  But this research should move that debate a step closer to a common set of facts.

One of the biggest challenges to the new Voter Photo ID laws is that it does not have any affect on absentee voting.

Arizona and Kansas addresses this with the requirement to supply citizenship documentation when registering to vote using the state forms.  If you register with any other forms, you can not vote in state elections, only federal elections.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!

Michael H. Drucker
Technorati talk bubble Technorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon