Showing posts with label Tennessee Voter-ID Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tennessee Voter-ID Law. Show all posts

Friday, January 17, 2014

PA Voter ID Law Struck Down


A state judge has struck down the law requiring Pennsylvania's voters to show photo identification at the polls.

Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley said the requirement that was the centerpiece of Pennsylvania's embattled 2012 voter identification law places an unreasonable burden on the fundamental right to vote.

The decision paves the way for an expected appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.  Republicans approved the law over the protests of Democrats.

During a 12-day trial this summer, plaintiffs said hundreds of thousands of voters lacked acceptable IDs and the inconvenience of getting a photo ID might discourage some from voting.  State officials insisted there were ample opportunities for voters to get a valid ID if they had none.

The court has barred enforcement of the law since the 2012 general election.

Other states with contested PHOTO-ID Laws:

Georgia - 66,516 Georgians, according to a recent study from the Brennan Center for Justice, lack state issued photo-id, also lack vehicle access and live more than 10 miles from an office that issues state ID.  On election day with no access to an acceptable form of identification you would vote with a provisional ballot.  To verify that ballot, you'll have two days to present appropriate photo ID at your county registrar's office, which at this point wouldn't be doable.

Indiana - You're a first-time voter in Indiana who registered to vote at the Bureau of Motor Vehicles using your Social Security number, a process that also required you to get a state identification card, which you placed in your wallet.  As a recent high school graduate who commutes with other workers to your full time job on a farm, you rarely need to present identification, so you didn't even bother to get a new ID card when it went missing from your locker a few weeks before the election.  You risk potential firing when you travel to your polling place with other members of your community on voting day, but you're intent on participating in your first election.  Without valid photo ID, however, you don't get to vote using the voting rquipment.  Under Indiana's new photo ID law, you're instead required to fill out a provisional ballot.  But you're told you'll still need to jump through additional hoops that could prove too demanding.  Now tasked with making visits during business hours to both the Indiana BMV to get a replacement ID, and then to the county elections board to verify your ballot, you decide keeping your job is more important than voting.

Kansas - You're a resident of Kansas in your early 60s, fully expecting to vote in November.  Your driver's license is your primary form of ID, but you rarely carry it anymore.  You don't drive and you haven't traveled abroad in years, leaving your passport expired or lost.  In the months before the election, you changed addresses, and for some reason never received a notification from the state reminding you that your license had expired.  On the day of the election, you head to your polling place, unaware that you're about to be told your license is expired and therefore invalid according to the state's new voter ID law (Kansans over the age of 65 can use expired IDs, but you're not there yet).  You're given a provisional ballot and informed that you must now "provide a valid form of identification to the county election officer in person or provide a copy by mail or electronic means before the meeting of the county board of canvassers."  While Kansas says it has historically counted around 70 percent of its provisional ballots, this year provides a different landscape.  The next steps can be somewhat difficult, and with the enacting of the state's photo ID law, the use of such ballots will undoubtedly become more commonplace.  Faced with disenfranchisement, you must now race against the clock to have your vote included.  With no other acceptable forms of ID available, you go about the process of renewing your license.  According to the state, this requires you to make your way to a state office, where you'll have to provide a number of identifying documents and pay the fee.  By the time you can find someone to chauffeur you through this process, public transportation is complex and unreliable where you live, even if you're in an urban center, most of the major election results have been announced on the news.  You decide the undertaking isn't worth the time.

Tennessee - 230,000 Tennesseans older than 60 possess driver's licenses that don't have photos on them.  Such ID will not be accepted at polling places in November.  While the state has agreed to issue photo IDs free to anyone who asks, a recent study found that only a tiny percentage of potential targets have applied.  Poll workers will tell you that you can cast a provisional ballot on Election Day.  You'll have until "the close of business on the second business day after the election" to find an applicable piece of identification and present it to a designated elections official. Whether it's your lack of an acceptable form of identification, the difficulty in finding transportation back to the elections official, or the prospect of having to go through the drain of the entire process again, you're might get discouraged, and give up.

CLICK HERE to read Ballot Access News Editor Richard Winger's explanation of the ruling.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!

Michael H. Drucker
Technorati talk bubble Technorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

TN Green Party Sues to Overturn Photo-ID at Polls Law


On August 26, the Green Party of Tennessee filed a federal lawsuit in the Eastern District, Green Party of Tennessee v Hargett, against Tennessee’s law that requires voters to show certain kinds of government photo-ID at the polls.

Alan Woodruff, an attorney in Gray, Tennessee, who has represented the Green Party in previous lawsuits, said he filed the complaint Monday morning. It names Tennessee Secretary of State Tre Hargett and Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins as defendants.

“There is no justification for having the photo ID requirement, as there is no such thing as voter fraud,” said Woodruff, who ran unsuccessfully for Congress last year as the Democratic nominee in the 1st Congressional District and might run again in 2014. “It’s overly burdensome. It affects minorities and the progressive-leaning voter more than the typical Republican conservative, and it was intended to.”

The General Assembly passed the voter identification law in 2011, requiring voters to show photo ID at the polls. It took effect in January 2012. Republicans say the law discourages voter fraud, which Democrats describe as extremely rare.

The Tennessee Court of Appeals upheld the new requirement in a state lawsuit last fall. It ruled that the state legislature has the right to pass laws that protect "the purity of the ballot box" and that asking for photo ID at the polls does not add a new requirement to voting.

The Green Party of Tennessee and the Constitution Party of Tennessee filed a suit in federal court in 2011 arguing that the state’s election laws present an insurmountable hurdle to third-party candidates who want to see their party affiliation on the ballot.

U.S. District Judge William J. Haynes Jr. granted the plaintiffs summary judgment in June of this year, ruling that state election laws violated not only smaller parties’ First Amendment right “to associate as a political party” but also the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Some of the reasons for the complaint:

1. The purpose of requiring voters to provide photo identification as a condition for in-person voting is to reduce/prevent in-person voter impersonation fraud. The State of Tennessee has no empirical evidence of the existence of in-person voter impersonation in the state. The State of Tennessee has no empirical evidence that the voter photo identification requirements of TCA §2-7-112 will reduce in-person voter impersonation fraud. The State of Tennessee had not, prior to the enactment of the voter photo identification requirements of TCA §2-7-112, had any proven case of voter impersonation fraud. The State of Tennessee cannot establish that the photo identification requirements of TCA §2-7-112 are necessary to achieve any of the objectives and purposes of the statute.

2. Photo identification cards are not required to register to vote. Only an affidavit of identity is required to register to vote. Voter signatures are required for voter registration. Voter signatures are recorded by the State of Tennessee when a voter registers to vote. Photo identification requirements have not been shown to be a more accurate form of verifying a person’s identity than that a person’s signature. The voter photo identification requirements of TCA §2-7-112 only apply to in-person voting. Persons voting by absentee ballot are not required to furnish photographic proof of identity. Absentee voting is a documented source of voter fraud nationally.

3. The forms of photo identification identified in TCA §2-7-112:
- Tennessee driver license
- Valid identification card issued by the state of Tennessee, or the United States where authorized by law to issue personal identification, provided, that such identification card contains a photograph of the voter. The limitations on acceptable forms of voter photo identification established by TCA §2-7-112 are more restrictive than needed to achieve Tennessee’s stated objective in enacting its voter photo identification. The voter photo identification requirements of TCA §2-7-112 burden the voting rights on in excess of 250,000 eligible voters. In excess of 100,000 Tennessee residents have a valid driver’s license that does not contain a photograph.

So first the Green Party says that voter-id at the polling place would not stop voter fraud as the fraud usually happens with absentee ballots. Then they argue the Republican House, Senate, and Governor passed a too restrictive voter-id law.

CLICK HERE to read the complaint.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!

Michael H. Drucker
Technorati talk bubble Technorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon