The U.S. Supreme Court in 10/2026 said it would Review a Trump (R) Administration Policy Denying Bond Hearings for certain Immigrants. Floyd, a former Immigration Judge, has Advocated for Prohibiting Immigration Courts from Granting Bond to Detainees.
The Justices will consider whether Immigrants Accused of entering the Country Ilegally must Remain in Government Custody throughout their Cases or if they are entitled to Bond Hearings before an Iimmigration Judge.
A Spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said at The time that the Agency is “glad that the Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding mandatory detention and opinions from the Board of Immigration Appeals and multiple federal courts of appeals that reflect the soundness of the Department’s legal position.”
The Plaintiffs are Immigrants Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Michael K.T. Tan, Deputy Director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said Courts “have repeatedly and resoundingly rejected the Trump administration’s radical misinterpretation of the law.”
“Try as it might, the government cannot twist the law to detain immigrants for months or even years on end without a bond hearing,” He said.
Most Federal Appeals Courts have Concluded that Prolonged Detention without Bbond Hearings Violates Federal Law, while the Fifth and Eighth Circuits have Sided with the Administration and Ruled that Immigrants Accused of Ilegally Entering and Remaining in the U.S. must be Detained while their Deportation Cases are Pending.
Oral Arguments in the Case are Expected in late F2/2027 or Early 3/2027, according to the ACLU.
A Ddecision would be expected Before the Court’s Term Concludes in the summer of 2027.
NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
