Showing posts with label NAN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NAN. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

NAN Largest Convention in the History of the Organization



I attended the 15th Annual National Convention of Reverend Al Sharpton's National Action Network (NAN). It took place, April 3-6 in New York City, at the Sheraton Hotel.

It was the largest attended NAN annual national convention and included delegates from over sixty NAN chapters across the United States.

There was a forum on Gun Control, Gun Violence: Addressing the Real Reform, and both the family of Hadiyah Pendleton, the 15-year-old who was fatally shot a week after performing with her high school band at the Inauguration of President Barack Obama, and the family of Trayvon Martin were in attendance. NAN delegates were asked to put pressure on their Senators to vote on stronger Gun legislation that could come up for debate in the Senate this week.

Several officials from the Obama Administration attended in Special Plenary Presentations: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, Regina M. Benjamin, Surgeon General of the United States, Secretary of Transportation, Ray LaHood, and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack.

Others spoke at ticketed events: Leading members of Congress and activists such as Martin Luther King, III, National Urban League President Marc Morial, NAACP President Ben Jealous, Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice President Kerry Kennedy.

The convention concluded with a major announcement by Rev. Al Sharpton, founder and President of NAN, regarding action plans formulated during the convention.

NAN will start an “Alert Watch” since the Supreme Court is deciding on Affirmative Action and Section 5 of The Voting Rights Act. NAN has issued an alert that will go into action in the event that the Supreme Court overturns either of the these policies. NAN will mobilize activists to urge Congressional action and to put pressure on the academic and corporate community if Affirmative Action is lost.

Other highlights of the national convention included the Measuring the Movement forum on the final day that brought together three generations of civil rights leaders to discuss strategies on what can be done to sustain civil rights and the social justice movement regardless of what the court’s decisions may be. The forum featured civil rights leaders and a review by some of the legends of the civil rights movement regarding the progress made and mistakes made in the fifty years since the “March in Washington.” The Forum included civil rights icons Rev. Joseph Lowery, Juanita Abernathy, Otis Moss, Jr., and Reverend Jesse Jackson Sr., among others.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!

Michael H. Drucker
Technorati talk bubbleTechnorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon


Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Protecting Our Vote During the Midterm Elections



I just attended a Political Panel called "Protecting Our Vote During the Midterm Elections" at the 15th Annual National Convention of Reverend Al Sharpton's National Action Network (NAN). It is taking place this week in New York City at the Sheraton Hotel.

First, some history about NAN.

NAN was founded in New York City in 1991, as a social justice, social policy, activist organization born of America's historic civil rights struggle. NAN is in the forefront of challenging today's threats to equal treatment under the law, whether it is police abuse, misconduct or racial profiling, economic injustice such as a lack of access to capital and opportunity; or social policy injustice such as education equality, voting rights, immigration reform, gender equality, marriage equality, gun control, health care, housing or worker's rights.

Reverend Al Sharpton is NAN's founding president and has led the organization for 22 years. He is a noted civil rights leader, host of MSNBC's Political Nation, and hosts a weekly radio broadcast on Saturday from NAN's national headquarters in central Harlem. NAN has grown to over 50 chapters across America and maintains offices in Washington, D.C.; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Atlanta, Georgia; Detroit, Michigan; Las Vegas, Nevada; Los Angeles, California and Miami, Florida. NAN's website is at: www.nationalactionnetwork.net.

Last year, during the national election cycle, NAN took the lead in pushing back the real threat to voting rights by exposing the efforts of many states to suppress the vote of primarily poor, elderly and minority voters through restrictive Voter ID laws. NAN's work was hugely successful as demonstrated by the unprecedented turnout of voters and their refusal to be intimidated or turned away from the polls.

The panel's moderator was Reverend Al Sharpton.

The panel members were:

Barbara R. Arnwine - President and Executive Director, The Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Nicole Austin-Hillery - Director and Counsel, The Brennan Center for Justice
Bishop Victor T. Curry - President, NAN, Miami-Dade County, Florida Chapter, Pastor, New Birth Baptist Church, Miami, Florida
Patrick Gaspard - Executive Director, Democratic National Committee
Bishop Bobby Hilton - President, NAN Cincinnati, OH Chapter
Rep. Marcia L. Fudge - Chairwoman, Congressional Black Caucus, 113th Congress
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries - Congressman, 8th District of NY
Rep. Gregory W. Meeks - Congressman, 5th District of NY
Laura Murphy - Director, Washington Legislative Office, American Civil Liberties Union
Rep. Charles B. Rangel - Congressman, 13th District of NY
Rep. Alicia Reece - State Rep., 33rd House District of Ohio
Rep. Joseph Crowley - Congressman, 14th District of NY

During the first round the panel talked about these issues: Voter ID Laws, Reduced Early Voting and Church Sunday Voting, Reduced Polling Places, Forced Provisional Ballots that are Not Counted, and Misinformation Tactics. The other issue was the Supreme Court June decisions about the Voting Rights Act Law and Section 5 Preclearance.

Then each panel member gave their ideas for the upcoming 2013 and 2014 elections and called this the "New Civil Rights Movement".

Some of the ideas were:

- Calling out corporations that are using shareholder's money to fund organizations that are responsible for the above tactics, using the term "There has to be consequences".

- Get involved in local Judge elections since they will be deciding some of these issues.

- This is a national issue, but now it is more important to get involved locally in a state by state fight.

There will be work to create a state by state agenda to first decide how to fight current situations and also preempt new ones. The Brenner Center had a three part program: reform the election system, increase early voting, and create national standards for each part of the election process.

The Justice Department has been preparing their ideas about changing our voting system. 

Assistant Attorney General Perez spoke at the George Washington University Law School Symposium on Friday, November 16, 2012. He discussed the Civil Rights Division’s work to protect the fundamental civil right that is the lifeblood of our democracy: the right to vote.

Some of the changes addressed what we can do both to protect the right to vote, and to improve the voting process:

1. Ensure that every eligible person entering a social service office can register to vote.

2. It should be the government’s responsibility to automatically register citizens to vote, by compiling, from databases that already exist, a list of all eligible residents in each jurisdiction. Of course, these lists would be used solely to administer elections and would protect essential privacy rights.

3. Election officials should work together to establish a program of permanent, portable registration – so that voters who move can vote at their new polling place on Election Day. Until that happens, we should implement fail-safe procedures to correct voter-roll errors and omissions, by allowing every voter to cast a regular, non-provisional ballot on Election Day. Several states have already taken this step.

4. Same-day registration is a reform we should be considering seriously – it would both facilitate election administration and promote electoral participation. For the 2012 election, eight states plus the District of Columbia had same-day registration in place. (Two more states have recently enacted it and will implement it next year – California, and Connecticut.) And we know that it increases participation: in both the 2008 and 2010 general elections, each of the eight states with same-day registration had higher turnout of the voting-eligible population than the national average. In fact, for the 2008 presidential election, five of the six states with the highest turnout in the country were states with same-day registration. Preliminary turnout estimates for the 2012 election show that this pattern will likely continue.

5. Voter fraud is not acceptable. But we also need to reform deceptive election practices and dishonest efforts to prevent certain voters from casting their ballots. Over the years, we’ve seen all sorts of attempts to gain partisan advantage by keeping people away from the polls – from literacy tests and poll taxes, to misinformation campaigns telling people that Election Day has been moved, or that only one adult per household can cast a ballot. Senators Schumer and Cardin recently introduced legislation that would deter and punish such harmful practices. This bill has sparked and helped to advance a critically important dialogue across – and beyond – Capitol Hill.

6. Provisional ballots - In some states and elections, large segments of the electorate are required to cast a provisional ballot instead of a regular ballot on election day, for any of a number of reasons. The Justice Department will be considering whether we need to propose concrete solutions, such as national standards for counting provisional ballots for federal elections, to ensure that voters are not disenfranchised by moves close to an election, by appearing in the wrong polling place or precinct, or by poll worker errors.

7. It’s time to rethink our largely partisan system of state and local election administration. We risk leaving our election processes open to partisan mischief – or to the perception of such mischief. We should have a serious conversation about solutions to this risk, including developing an entirely professionalized and non-partisan system for administering our elections.

What are your ideas about changing the election process?










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!

Michael H. Drucker
Technorati talk bubbleTechnorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

NAN 20th Anniversary & 13th National Convention

National Action Network (NAN) is one of the leading civil rights organizations in the world and is in the forefront of social justice in the United States. As a direct outgrowth of the movement that was built and led by the Rev. Dr. Martin L. King, Jr., NAN was founded in New York City in 1991 by the Rev. Al Sharpton and a group of activists that were committed to the principles of non-violent direct action and civil disobedience. I was asked to attend the convention and was in the audience for the following Opening Panel and Special Plenary Presentation.


Politics 2011 - 2012 What Are the Issues?
Moderated By: Rev. Al Sharpton

Panelists:
Charles M. Blow - Columnist, New York Times
Harold E. Ford, Jr. - Former Congressman and NYU Professor
Kirsten John Foy - Director of Intergovernmental & Community Affairs, Office of the New York City Public Advocate
George Gresham - President, 1199 SEIU
Frederick D. Hayes, III - Senior Pastor, Friendship West Baptist Church, Dallas, TX
David Jefferson, Sr. - Senior Paster, Metropolitan Baptist Church, Newark, NJ
Roberto Ramirez - Founding Partner, MirRam Group, LLC
Jacqueline Salit - President, IndependentVoting.org
Lee A. Saunders - Secretary-Treasure, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)

Special Plenary Presentation I:
David Axelrod - Former Senior White House Advisor to President Barack Obama

The thrust of the conversations was the need to address these issues for 2012:

1. Jobs
2. Hunger
3. Education
4. Workers Rights
5. Immigration

The statement "Who Gets to Feel Secure" could be the defining issue between which major party the voters' put into the White House.

All these issues will not be addressed until we fix the follwing:

Because so many of the primaries and other selection processes were OPEN, the independent voter gave Obama the opportunity to win the election. But today, the Republicans are trying to CLOSE their primaries so this won't happen in the future. This effort must be stopped, but only as a holding effort.

With over 38% of registered voters having not selected a party, they want to vote for candidates not parties. But in many states you can only select a party's primary ballot if you want to take part in the political process. So the need for something like the Open Primary / Top Two that was put into place in CA, with some modifications, could be a good structural political reform.

As evident with our current stalemates in Congress, just selecting a President isn't the final answer. We must prepare the foundation for a truly successful administration that will work for the people. To do this, we need to elect local, state, and Congressional candidates that will be flexible in the process of making this country work and support the President.









NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote!

Michael H. Drucker
Technorati talk bubble Technorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon