Showing posts with label Motor Voter law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Motor Voter law. Show all posts

Friday, July 15, 2016

NJ Improves Voter Registration Opportunities


Voting rights advocates and New Jersey officials announced today that they have reached a settlement to ensure low-income citizens are provided voter registration services through public assistance agencies, as required by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

New Jerseyans will be able to access these registration options in advance of the 2016 Presidential elections.

Commonly known as the “Motor Voter” law, the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) requires motor vehicle agencies, as well as Public Assistance Agencies that provide services such as Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other benefits, to proactively offer voter registration services to their clients.

Since the implementation of the NVRA in 1993, over 170 million Americans have applied to get on the voter rolls through these registration services.

The settlement follows a notice letter to the Governor and Department of Human Services (DHS) from Project Vote, Demos, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Rutgers Constitutional Rights Clinic, the NAACP, and the law firm of McCarter & English.

The coalition’s notice letter, sent on behalf of the New Jersey State Conference of the NAACP, alleged that New Jersey’s Public Assistance Agencies were not consistently offering clients on SNAP, TANF, and Medicaid an opportunity to register to vote.

CLICK HERE to read the Notice Letter.











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
Digg! StumbleUpon

Monday, November 9, 2015

iVote Pushes Automatic Voter Registration




A group of former aides to President Obama and President Bill Clinton is pledging to spend up to $10 million on a push to make voter registration automatic whenever someone gets a driver’s license.

The change would supercharge the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, known as the “motor voter” law, which requires states to offer people the option of registering to vote when they apply for driver’s licenses or other identification cards. The new laws would make registration automatic during those transactions unless a driver objected.

The group, called iVote, which is led by Jeremy Bird, who ran Mr. Obama’s voter turnout effort in 2012, is betting that such laws could bring out millions of new voters who have, for whatever reason, failed to register even when they had the opportunity at motor vehicle departments. Many of those new voters would be young, poor or minorities, groups that tend to support Democratic candidates, Mr. Bird said.

Under automatic voter registration, a teenage driver too young to vote would immediately become registered when he or she turned 18.

Craig T. Smith, who was the political director in Mr. Clinton’s White House and is advising iVote, said legislation to enact automatic voter registration was pending in 17 states. The group is hoping to help push through as many of those bills as possible next year.

The group also plans to begin a petition drive in Ohio to put automatic registration on the ballot next November. And it is exploring the possibility of ballot measures in Colorado, Florida and Nevada.

“The right to vote has come under siege,” Mr. Smith said. “Part of this is to retake the momentum, to make it easier to vote.”

But the effort will not be easy. Republicans control 30 state legislatures, and as of January, 32 states will have Republican governors. Any push for automatic registration in those states is certain to meet stiff resistance.

In addition, new laws are unlikely to be enacted in time for automatic registration to be put in place for the 2016 election.

Kris W. Kobach, the secretary of state in Kansas and a Republican, who has been a leading advocate of stricter voting laws, said he opposed automatic registration because people who chose not to register were clearly not interested in voting. “The assumption that by making what is already easy automatic that will somehow bring people to the polls is just erroneous,” Mr. Kobach said. “I just think it’s a bad idea. It’s not going to increase participation rates.”

Democrats have criticized the Republican efforts as an assault on voters’ rights. Eric H. Holder Jr., Mr. Obama’s first attorney general, said in March that “it has been clear in recent years that fair and free access to the franchise is still, in some areas, under siege.” In August, Mr. Obama wrote in a letter to The New York Times that “our state leaders and legislatures must make it easier — not harder — for more Americans to have their voices heard.”

The effort by iVote is the first major push to counter the Republican moves with a legislative strategy to expand voter rights.

Pete Giangreco, who was a top direct mail and media consultant for Mr. Obama’s presidential campaigns, said Republicans opposed automatic registration because they wanted to discourage Democratic-leaning citizens from casting ballots. “They don’t want people to vote,” Mr. Giangreco said. “They’ve gotten very, very good at using technicalities, at disenfranchising individuals — young, immobile, poor, people of color. And those are people that tend to vote Democratic.”

Mr. Giangreco dismissed the criticisms from Mr. Kobach. Motor vehicle departments already prevent non-citizens from registering to vote by obtaining citizenship information from government databases, he said, and under the existing systems, many people who have failed to register could change their minds as an election nears.

He pointed to a recent study by Oxford Journals that looked at people who searched Google for voter registration information even though their deadlines had passed. The study estimated that up to four million unregistered people in the United States appeared to want to vote after all.

“We win two ways” if automatic registration is enacted, Mr. Giangreco said. “We think more turnout is better for democracy in general — and Democrats in particular.”

Here in New York, the effort has been to have any official contact with a government entity resulting with being offered a voter registration form to legal residents.











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
Digg! StumbleUpon

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Texas and the National Voter Registration Act


Thousands of Texans are being disenfranchised thanks to chronic failures in the state’s voter registration system, a Democratic group alleges based on government records and extensive additional evidence. The charges raise serious questions about Texas’s commitment to making the ballot box accessible to new voters, and about its compliance with federal voting law.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Texas Secretary of State Carlos Cascos, lawyers for Battleground Texas, which works to register voters in the state, wrote that the state government’s “voter registration failures are widespread and systematically undermining the right to vote in Texas.”

The letter is likely to precede a lawsuit under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), more commonly known as the Motor Voter law, which requires states to offer registration opportunities through their motor vehicle departments and other government agencies. “If the state does not want to engage and take the steps necessary to fix this, then we’re prepared to initiate legal action,” Peter Kraus, a lawyer representing Battleground Texas, said in a phone interview.

The allegations offer the latest evidence that Texas’s Republican administration is creating obstacles to voting as the state’s soaring Hispanic population threatens to shift the balance of power in the state. Around 2 million Texas Hispanics are unregistered, and just 39% of eligible Hispanics in the state voted in 2012, compared to 61% of eligible whites and 63% of eligible blacks.

Battleground was launched in 2013 by former Obama campaign staffers with the goal of making Texas competitive for Democrats by registering new voters.

Voter registration snafus also disproportionately affect people who move frequently: the poor, minorities, and young people. All those groups tend to vote Democratic.

It’s impossible to quantify just how many Texans have been disenfranchised thanks to the registration breakdowns identified by Battleground Texas. State records obtained via an open records request submitted by the group show that over the last four months of 2013 and all of last year, counties received over 4,600 complaints from would-be voters about registration issues, some of which appear not even to have been investigated.

Probably not all of those voters were ultimately kept from the polls, since Texas says some have subsequently been registered, though it’s not clear whether that happened before or after they tried to vote. But the 4,600 number is itself likely the tip of the iceberg of those who have had problems. For one thing, the tally only included data from the fewer than half of the state’s counties that reported complaints to the state. For another, lodging a complaint with the county can be a multi-step process that takes a certain level of initiative. That strongly suggests the number captures only a small fraction of those who faced obstacles.

Whatever the actual figure, the data make clear that the number of eligible voters being kept from the polls thanks to registration problems is exponentially greater than the number of ineligible voters casting ballots in the state, a concern that led Texas to pass the country’s strictest voter ID law. Since 2000, there have been just two proven cases of in-person fraud that would have been prevented by an ID requirement.

Battleground’s letter stops short of alleging that Texas is deliberately making it difficult to register to vote. But Kraus said it’s clear, at the very least, that the state hasn’t chosen to devote adequate resources to the task. “What it comes down to is, there does not appear to be a priority with the Secretary of State to make sure that the Department of Public Safety is taking down the information, and properly transmitting it to the voter rolls,” said Kraus.

To support that conclusion, the letter lays out reams of evidence pointing to serious problems with the state’s registration procedures for those applying to obtain or update their driver’s license:

- Texas’s online procedures, Battleground alleges, “openly violate the NVRA.” When an online applicant is asked whether she wants to register to vote and checks ‘yes,’ the Motor Voter law requires that her registration file be automatically updated. Instead, Texas provides a link to the Secretary of State’s website, where a voter registration form can be downloaded. But Texas counties nonetheless use driver’s license changes of address to remove people from the rolls. “This perverse result cannot be reconciled with the NVRA’s goal of increasing the number of eligible citizens on the voter rolls,” Kraus and Battleground legal director Mimi Marziani write.

- Texas’s in-person procedures likewise violate the NVRA, Battleground alleges. Sixty-five complaints were found to have come from people who checked neither “yes” nor “no” when asked if they wanted to register to vote, or who mistakenly checked both boxes. In both circumstances, Battleground claims, the NVRA requires that the applicant be registered. Keith Ingram, the director of the Elections Division at the Secretary of State’s office acknowledged in an email to Battleground that it didn’t do so, appearing to take the position that the law doesn’t require it.

- Between September 2013 and February 2015, according to state records, Texans reported to the state over 1,700 incidents where they checked “yes,” indicating they wanted to register to vote, when completing a driver’s license application in person at the DPS but did not appear on the rolls. These voters were ultimately registered, Ingram told Battleground. But the fact that they complained suggests the delay kept many from voting.

- Battleground says a hotline it set up for the November 2014 midterm election received “dozens” of calls from voters who had tried to register or update their voter registration information at a DPS office but did not appear on the rolls.

- Some of the complaints received by counties from voters who were forced to cast provisional ballots appear not even to have been investigated. Government records show that four days before the November 2012 election, one DPS staffer wrote in an email to another that an official with the Secretary of State’s office “is going to send an email to all of the county voter registrars to instruct them that they must have their requests for verification for the provisional ballots to us by noon on Thursday, November 8. We will do our best to process all of them and return them by midnight on Friday, but she is telling them there is no guarantee. If we don’t get them all done, then we don’t and she said there is nothing we can do at that point.” Subsequent emails show that complaints from at least 302 voters weren’t received until after November 8, and were ignored.

Administrative problems aside, Texas already has the strictest voter registration rules in the country. Non-Texans are barred from registering voters; anyone registering voters must undergo training through the county; no one can register voters in counties other than the county where they were appointed; and all voter registration applications must be personally delivered, rather than mailed.

Republican lawmakers this month killed a bill that would have established online voter registration in the state, citing the threat of fraud.

Those who do successfully register must also contend with the state’s voter ID law, which has twice been struck down by courts as racially discriminatory but was in effect last fall thanks to an order from the Supreme Court. An estimated 600,000 registered Texas voters, disproportionately minorities, don’t have the ID needed under the law. “I do firmly believe that the state has implemented a series of laws that make it difficult to vote,” Battleground Texas executive director Jenn Brown said in an interview. “Whether or not the registration problems fit into that, I think we’re not sure yet, but it’s something that we’re really thinking about as we’re starting a conversation with them.”

Texas is far from the first state to face claims that it’s failing to make voter registration easy enough under the motor voter law. Last year, California agreed to mail registration cards to nearly 4 million people who signed up for Obamacare benefits, after good-government groups threatened a lawsuit. And the Obama administration itself was accused last year by voting rights groups of not doing enough to help Obamacare applicants register to vote, despite claims by congressional Republicans that it was doing too much.

The New York City Council recently approved a bill to correct this problem.











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker Technorati talk bubble Technorati Tag in Del.icio.us Digg! StumbleUpon