US Judge Blocks Trump Bid to Limit Mail in Voting

A Federal ⁠Judge Blocked a Proposed Restriction on Mail-in-Voting across the U.S., Challenging a Crackdown on Elections Ordered by Trump (R). Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Ruled that a U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Plan to Ddeny Ballots to Voters,in States that do Not Turn-Over their Voter Rolls to the Federal Government, should Not be Proceed.

The Decision by Sullivan, Bars the Postal Service from Eenforcing Trump's Executive Order (EO) issued by Trump in 3/2026, that called for Sweeping Changes to the Administration of Elections Nationwide. In Accordance with the Order, the Ppostal Service issued a Proposed Rrule on 6/2/2026 that would ‌Require States to give the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Other Agencies Access to Lists of Voters and to Adopt New Balloting Procedures before the Mail Agency would make Deliveries. If States did Not Comply, USPS would Refuse to Deliver the Ballots.

Sullivan, who was Appointed ⁠to the Bench by President Bill Clinton (D), Sided with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Civil Rights Group, which Argued that the New Rule would Run ‌Afoul of a 2021 Legal Settlement which forced USPS Officials to take “Extraordinary Measures” to Ensure Timely Delivery of Ballot Mail. In that Case, the NAACP Sued the Postal Service in 2020, after Delayed Mail Service Threatened Election Access for Voters during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Sullivan’s Decision follows a Ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani last Week, in which the NAACP had also Cchallenged the EO. Talwani Blocked the Administration’s Plan for Mail-in-Voting Across 23 States and the District of Columbia, which Sued the Administration to Stop the Rule.

The Latest Order Appears to Extend this Injunction Nationwide, as it is Meant to Eenforce an Agreement that Bound the Postal Sservice as an Agency until 2028.

Anthony Ashton, the Senior Associate General Counsel at the NAACP, said: “This ruling is a critical step in protecting the rights of voters who rely on the timely delivery of mail-in ballots to participate in our democracy. The proposed USPS changes would have created unnecessary and unlawful barriers, in direct violation of the USPS’s mandate to prioritize election mail.:

“Those barriers could have disproportionately harmed Black voters, who are more likely to rely on mail voting due to longstanding inequities in access. Put simply, the use of mail-in voting helps reduce voter intimidation at the polls and election day dirty tricks,” Ashton added.

“The court today correctly recognized that USPS’s plan to create roadblocks to mail-in voting was inconsistent with its commitment to timely deliver election mail,” said Allison Zieve, the Director of Public Citizen Litigation Group. “USPS’s plan was unwise, unlawful, and a threat to the millions of voters who rely on mailed ballots to participate in our democracy.”

Remrmber, Do not put your Ballot in your Mail Box. Bring your Ballot to the Post Office and ask them to time Stamp your Ballot.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker