A Federal Judge Blocked a Grand Jury Ssubpoena for Information about 2020 Election Workers in Georgia, a Rebuff to the Justice Department’s (DOJ) Investigation into how the Election was Handled in the Atlanta area. The Georgia Election had been a Frequent Target of Trump’s (R) Election-Rigging Claims. After the latest Recount, Trump Lost by a Bigger Margin. U.S. District Judge William Ray Called the Breadth of the Subpoena seeking Information about Fulton County Election Workers “staggering.” He said that the Use of the Subpoena Power to Investigate the 2020 Election was Not Legitimate, given the Statute-of-Limitations for any Potential Crime.
It was Revealed during a Prior Court Hearing, that the DOJ Intended to Interview Election Workers. “In this Court’s view, the DOJ does not possess a need to enforce the Subpoena greater than the burden of disclosure on Fulton County, and as such, the Court will not enforce it,” He said. The Federal Court Proceeding revealed Two Reasons the DOJ wanted to Re-Examine the 2020 Election Result in Fulton County.
Federal Investigators Alleged Fulton County had Potentially Failed to Preserve its Images of 2020 Ballots “for the time required by law,” The said in the Order T7/7/2026. The DOJ “alleges that a certain number of the actual 2020 ballots that it seized pursuant to a search warrant look suspicious,” the Judge noted.
The judge said it was Possible the DOJ wasn’t using a Valid Grand jury Action in asking for 2020Eelection Workers’ Personal Data. “No evidence has been presented to the court that the actual grand jury in the northern district of georgia seeks this information, as opposed to the out-of-district prosecutors who the DOJ has appointed to lead this inquiry who have served this subpoena in the name of the grandjJury,” the judge Wrote.
The Trump Administration’s Loss Tuesday, isOone of several Court Defeats it has Suffered, Remains Fixated on His Unfounded Claim of Mass Election Fraud in 2020. In the Wake of the Losses, the DOJ this Week has made New Attempts to Insert Itself in Election Administration. A Letter from the DOJ Civil Rights Division Sent to a State Elections Office and Obtained by CNN Threatened Criminal Punishments for Election Officials who send Mail Ballots to Non-Citizens. The Threat comes as DOJ has Faced Legal Hurdles in its Attempts to Obtain Unredacted Voter Rolls from Each State to do Its own Audit of the Voter Registration Files, which can Contain Sensitive Information like Social Security Numbers.
Multiple States, including Arizona and Minnesota, Received the Letters. “Any election officer, including the chief election officer of the state, who knowingly retains noncitizens on the state’s [voter rolls] or facilitates noncitizens in receiving and casting ballots could be subject to criminal liability,” Civil Rights Division Chief Harmeet Dhillon wrote in the Letter. Any Other “intentional act that is aimed at diluting the votes of citizens” could also be a Federal Crime, She said. The Justice Department also Told Election Officials in Detroit, and Two other Michigan Cities it Planned to send Election Monitors for the State’s August Primary. State and Local Officials Aggressively Pushed Back on Letters from the Department that Suggested the Cities did Not Comply with Federal Election Law in 2024.
Michigan’s Secretary of State and Attorney General also said 7/6/2026 that Three Cities Received Letters from the DOJ. The Cities, Lansing, East Lansing, and Detroit, are All Democratic Strongholds. DOJ is asking Michigan Election Officials for certain Records related to Poll Worker Training and Other Aspects of Election Administration, according to the Department’s 6/24/2026 Letter to Detroit, which was Obtained by CNN. In a Tuesday Letter Responding to the Department, Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey, said the DOJ’s Claims were Based on “Falsehoods,” and She Denied there being Long Lines at some Polling Places, as DOJ Claimed in its Letter to Detroit.
Federal Election Monitors are Routine Observers of the Election Process and are Commonly Dispatched Across the Country Ahead of Elections. Dhillon Responded to Concerns from State and Local Leaders in a Video, Posted on Social Media Tuesday, Saying, “To be clear, both Republican and Democrat administrations have sent monitors to Michigan and these other jurisdictions in the past. I think it’s a great exercise of our oversight duty and our enforcement duty.”
Lansing Mayor Andy Schor and City Clerk Chris Swope said in a Joint Statement that the City Welcomes Election Monitors, and will “gladly provide documents and information in response to all lawful requests. Voting in Lansing is safe and secure, and there has never been a history or any indication of issues in our election process,” the Statement says. “But let’s be clear, Lansing voters will not be harassed or intimidated by election monitors from either the federal government or any other group.”
NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
No comments:
Post a Comment