Results for RCV and Electoral System Ballot Measures in 2024

The following Lists the Ballot Measures related to Electoral Systems and their Election Results:

Alaska: Ballot Measure 2 - Repeal the Top-Four Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) system that was adopted in 2020, Yes 124,762 (51%), No 120,059 (49%).

Arizona:

Proposition 133 - Require Partisan Primary Elections for Partisan Offices and Prohibit Primary Elections where All Candidates, regardless of Political Party Affiliation, run in the same Primary Election, such as Top-Two, Top-Four, and Top-Five Primaries, Yes 854,083 (42%), No 1,174,925 (58%).

Proposition 140 - Require Primaries in which Candidates, regardless of Partisan Affiliation, appear on a Single Ballot and a certain number Advance to the General Election, and Require General Election Candidates to receive a Majority of Votes, Yes 846,240 (41%), No 1,219,198 (59%).

Colorado: Proposition 131 - Establish Top-Four Primaries and Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) for Federal and State Offices, Yes 1,066,336 (45%), NO 1,313,969 (55%).

Idaho: Proposition 1 - Establish Top-Four Primaries and Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) for Federal, State, and certain Local Offices, Yes 246,610 (31%), No 557,607 (69%).

Missouri: Amendment 7 -Prohibit Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) and the State Local and Governments from allowing Non-Citizens to Vote, Yes 1,952,138 (68%), No 899,408 (32%).

Montana: Establish Top-Four Primaries for Federal and State Offices, Yes 240,395 (48%), No 258,040 (52%).

- Require an Electoral System in which Candidates for certain Offices must Win a Majority of the Vote, rather than a Plurality, to Win the Election, Yes 191,301 (39%), No 299,075 (61%).

Nevada: Question 3 - Establish Top-Five Primaries and Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) for Federal and State Offices, Yes 559,110 (46%), No 664,709 (54%).

Oregon Measure 117 - Establish Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) for Federal and State Offices, Yes 576,723 (40%), No 862,878 (60%).

South Dakota: Constitutional Amendment H - Establish Top-Two Primaries for Federal, State, and certain Local Offices, Yes 121,770 (34%), No 236,725 (66%).

Local

Richmond, California Measure L - Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting for Mayoral and City Council Elections, Yes 11,476 (53%), No 10,112 (47%).

District of Columbia D.C. Initiative 83 - Establish Ranked-Choice Voting for Elections in Washington, D.C., Yes 174,528 (72%), No 66,681 (28%).

Oak Park, Illinois Ranked-Choice-Voting (RNC) Initiative - adopt Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) to Elect the Oak Park President and Village Board of Trustees, Yes 15,959 (79%), No 4,243 (21%).

Peoria, Illinois Referral - Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) Advisory Question, Advise the Government to Adopt Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV), Yes 20,198 (67%), No 10,045 (33%).

Bloomington, Michigan Initiative - Question 1, Repeal Ranked-Choice-Voting (RCV) for Mayoral and City Council Elections, Yes 23,360 (49%), No 24,596 (51%).

Oakridge, Oregon Referral - Measure 20-364, Enact STAR Voting for Municipal Rlections for Three Election Cycles, Yes 498 (46%), No 575 (54%).

Eugene, Oregon Initiative - Measure 20-349, Enact STAR Voting, that allows Voters to score Candidates from 0 to 5 Stars, and Automatically Advances the Top Two to a Runoff, for Mayoral and City Council Elections, Yes 15,871 (36%), No 28,818 (64%).










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker