Monday, May 23, 2022

AK’s Campaign Finance Limits Fight


A last-minute Deal in Alaska's State Legislature, to Restore Donation Limits for Political Campaigns collapsed Wednesday, allowing Wealthy Donors to spend Unlimited sums on State Elections this year, as Good Government Advocates, contemplate a Citizens Initiative to reimpose the Caps.

“It was a devastating outcome,” said Anchorage Sen. Bill Wielechowski (D-District H), who tried and Failed to push Limits through his Chamber late Wednesday. “The ability of someone, anyone, in the United States to drop $1 million into an election is just stunning and startling, and should be of concern to every single Alaskan.”

Alaska had some of the Lowest Political Donation limits in the Country, $500 per person, per year, until last summer, when a Federal Appeals Court ruled that the Caps Unconstitutionally restricted Free Speech.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s (R) Administration asked that the Case Not be reconsidered, even when a Judge called for a New Hearing. And the Governor later said he’s inclined to support Unlimited Donations, as long as they’re Publicly disclosed.

One key Opponent of Campaign Finance Limits said Thursday, he was pleased Lawmakers didn’t restore Caps this year. The result, he argued, is that more Donations will go from Donors directly to Politicians, rather than to independently Spending groups that are Unaffiliated with Candidates.

“I think the consequence will be that we’ll have a system that’s more responsive to the voters, and more transparent,” said Attorney Robin Brena, whose Firm represented the Conservative Activists, who Sued to remove the Donation Limits. “And I think those are good for our democracy.”

Alaska’s Three leading Gubernatorial Candidates: Dunleavy, Bill Walker (I), and Les Gara (R), are all now Soliciting Donations of $10,000 or more on their Campaign websites.

But the Mew landscape for Alaska Campaign Contributions may Not be Permanent. Many Lawmakers still support Reimposing Higher Limits than the ones the Appeals Court invalidated, making the subject likely to reappear during the Next Legislative Session.

Anchorage Rep. Calvin Schrage (I-25th District), who led the State House’s efforts to Restore Higher Limits, said he’s now considering launching a Citizens Initiative, the same Method that Activists originally used to establish the $500 per Person Cap in 2006.

“I’m pretty darn confident I’ll go forward with that, because it’s just something Alaskans want,” Schrage said Thursday. “If the Legislature fails to act, we should make sure voters get a chance to stand up for Alaska and Alaskans.”

Lawmakers were, in fact, poised to act in the Final hours of their Session Wednesday, which was the Constitutional deadline for the Legislature to finish its business. A Bill sponsored by Schrage, which would have capped Donations from Individuals at $2,000, had already passed the House. But it had Stalled for Two months in the Senate State Affairs Committee, Chaired by Wasilla Sen. Mike Shower (R-District E).

As the Legislature’s deadline approached, Wielechowski said that he’d been working with a group of Legislators, including Shower, on a deal to Reinstate the Donation Limits.

Their idea was combining campaign finance caps, which tend to enjoy stronger support from liberal-leaning legislators, with a batch of election reform proposals that have bipartisan buy-in.

Those Proposals included State-paid Postage and Enhanced Tracking and Security for Absentee Ballots, and Open-Source Election Software that Skeptics could analyze themselves. There was also Same-Day Voter Registration, though those Ballots would be scrutinized by a Review Board before being Counted.

The Package, Wielechowski said, had support from Legislators in both the House and Senate. And the Election Reform Provisions would have given the Governor, who Lawmakers feared would Veto a Standalone Contribution Limits Bill, reason to sign it, since Dunleavy’s has pushed similar Reform efforts itself. “Both sides gave; both sides got,” Wielechowski said. “I’m fairly confident that it would have passed both bodies, and the governor would not have vetoed it.”

But the Plan hit a hitch: For some reason, the State Attorneys who Draft Bills for Lawmakers, took much longer than expected to write Wielechowski’s Amendment. As the clock ticked toward Midnight without the Document, Wielechowski said he called the Lawyers repeatedly, at 4 p.m., 6 p.m., and 8 p.m., before finally, on the line with the WB_wombat Top Attorney at 10 p.m., he strode into the Senate.

Wielechowski handed the Phone to the Chamber’s President, Peter Micciche (R-District O), and asked Micciche to tell the Attorneys to “send an amendment — I’ll leave out some of the more colorful language — right now.”










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


No comments: