Sunday, February 5, 2017

Does Bannon Need Senate Approval for Seat On National Security Council?


U.S. Code 50, section 3021, defines the Members of the National Security Council (NSC) as the President, Vice President, Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy and the Secretaries and Under Secretaries of other Executive Departments and of the Military Departments, when appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to serve at his pleasure.

Trump's Executive Order, like Directives issued by President Obama and others before him, changes the makeup of the Council.

Unlike Obama, however, Trump specifically added both his Chief of Staff, Reince Priebus, and his Chief Strategist, Bannon, as regular Attendees to the Principals Committee (PC), described in the Memorandum as "the Cabinet-level senior interagency forum for considering policy issues that affect the national security interests of the United States", not to the National Security Council or the Homeland Security Council.

While placing Bannon on the NSC has no doubt been controversial, Harvard Law Professor Larry Tribe said there is no reason to believe Bannon needs to go before the Senate first:

“[N]othing in the Constitution or in any Act of Congress makes membership in what has been called the Principals Committee, which is formally and structurally not part of the National Security Council but an advisory group hitched to the Council by an invisible cord, a position that mandates the Senate’s advice and consent.”

President Trump's memorandum both adds Bannon, the Chief Strategist, to the PC and designates him an invitee to any NSC meeting:

The Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, the Assistant to the President and Chief Strategist, the Counsel to the President, the Deputy Counsel to the President for National Security Affairs, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget are invited as attendees to any NSC meeting.

The PC shall have as its regular attendees the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, the Assistant to the President and Chief Strategist, the National Security Advisor, and the Homeland Security Advisor. The Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall attend where issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed. The Counsel to the President, the Deputy Counsel to the President for National Security Affairs, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget may attend all PC meetings.


Jordan Brunner notes in LawFareBlog that the wording is important in determining whether Bannon needs a Senate Confirmation hearing or not:

“But Bannon isn’t on the NSC, he is merely an “invitee.” Considering the control Bannon apparently wields, that may seem like a distinction without a difference, but the President is allowed to “invite” anyone he wants to attend NSC meetings, there is no requirement that these “invitees” be confirmed.”

Bannon’s other role is more formal. He is a “Regular Attendee” of the PC. The PC is the “Cabinet-level Inter-Agency Forum for considering Policy issues that affect National Security.” But nothing in the National Security Act dictates who sits on the PC.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said the precedent for including Political Operatives on the NSC Committee was set by President Obama, when he put Bannon's counterpart, David Axelrod, on the Committee.

Axelrod countered that he was an observer, not a formal member of the Principals committee, unlike Bannon:

“I was not a member of the committee. I did not speak or participate. I sat on the sidelines as a silent observer with Gibbs because we would be called upon to publicly discuss the president's decision on that critical matter and the process by which he arrived at it. We knew our presence chagrined some of the principals but, acting on the president's instructions, we were there to gain a thorough understanding of what would be one of the most important judgments he would make as commander-in-chief. Our access also came with limits. We were barred from some of the most sensitive meetings on the Afghanistan-Pakistan policy review so as not to inhibit discussions. Beyond that, Gibbs and I did not attend regular meetings of the NSC Principals committee or their deputies nor were we invited to weekly meetings on terrorist threats.”

It appears unlikely that Bannon needs to be Confirmed by the Senate to sit on the PC of the NSC or attend meetings as an invitee, but what is clear is that President Trump's reshuffling of the body has stirred controversy and is in many ways unprecedented. The announcement caused former National Security Advisor Susan Rice to tweet it was "stone cold crazy."

Tribe said Bannon's role is "crazy and dangerous," but it doesn't seem to violate any law, "though it probably should."

Per CNN Politics:

To date, every version of the Committee has included the Joint Chiefs Chairman and the Director of the CIA or, once it was established, the head of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). DNI James Clapper was always included in Obama Administration's NSC's PC meetings, CNN confirmed.

Bannon's presence reinforces the notion he is, in essence, a Co-Chief of Staff alongside Chief of Staff Priebus, and demonstrates the breadth of influence the former Head of Breitbart News has in the Trump Administration.

On 30th January 2017, after a media firestorm, the White House announced President Trump will reinstate the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director as a regular PC Member, while still keeping Bannon on board.

Meanwhile, the DNI and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will still not be regular Attendees but will attend when "issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed."











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
Digg! StumbleUpon

No comments: